Forward Capacity Market (FCM)
Competitive Power Ventures’ proposal to revamp ISO-NE's financial assurance rules failed to win approval from NEPOOL’s Participants Committee.
Massachusetts broke from NESCOE's stance on the elimination of ISO-NE's MOPR, saying the rule should be disposed of as soon as possible, without any delay.
Fletcher6, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
FERC has a number of paths it could take with ISO-NE's filing proposing a transitioned MOPR removal.
FERC agreed to allow ISO-NE to adjust the schedule for next year’s Forward Capacity Auction 17, which was delayed because of the Killingly Energy Center.
New England’s Forward Capacity Auction last month offered no big surprises, but it did hint at coming shifts in the dynamics of the region’s energy supply.
ISO-NE was forced to wait several weeks to publish the results of the capacity auction because of uncertainty surrounding the Killingly Energy Center.
FERC issued an order affirming its decision to deny rehearing to NTE Energy on the termination of the company’s capacity supply obligation for Killingly.
ISO-NE asked the D.C. Circuit to undo its order keeping the Killingly capacity supply obligation alive and holding up the results of the capacity auction.
It could be another month before stakeholders and the public in New England find out the results of ISO-NE’s capacity auction from last week.
The NEPOOL Markets Committee considered changes to ISO-NE's retirement and financial assurance rules.
Want more? Advanced Search