The New York Integrating Public Policy Task Force tackled the complex issue of avoiding the pitfall of “carbon leakage.”

New York stakeholders on Monday wrestled with the complex issue of how to evaluate the impact of a carbon charge on the dispatch of energy resources - especially in neighboring regions.

How should New York set carbon prices - and who should be tasked with doing it? Those are questions the state's Integrating Public Policy Task Force have begun to tackle in its effort to integrate carbon pricing into NYISO's market.

Constitution Pipeline asked FERC to reconsider a January order upholding a denial of the company’s water permit application by New York environmental regulators, saying the commission “erred” in its interpretation of the federal Clean Water Act.

Stakeholders told New York and NYISO officials they are concerned about the transparency and aim of the process being laid out to integrate carbon pricing.

NYISO will soon announce the formation of a carbon pricing task force, CEO Brad Jones told the Management Committee.

“Everything has to change,” New York State Chairman of Energy and Finance Richard L. Kauffman said at Greentech Media’s New York REV Future 2017 conference.

Connecticut regulators got an earful at a public comment session on the future of Dominion Energy’s Millstone nuclear plant.

A $40/ton carbon emissions charge in NY state would have “a relatively small impact” on customer costs, according to an analysis released by NYISO.

Industry stakeholders gave advice on distributed energy resource (DER) oversight to staff of the New York State Department of Public Service.