November 24, 2024
ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee Briefs: March 27, 2019
Reduction in Peaker Net Margin Threshold Tabled
ERCOT's Technical Advisory Committee tabled a request to lower the grid operator’s peaker net margin threshold pending further direction from the Texas PUC.

The ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee last week tabled a request to lower the grid operator’s peaker net margin (PNM) threshold pending further direction from the Public Utility Commission of Texas, which is debating the threshold’s continued existence.

The PNM threshold is used to determine the point at which ERCOT’s systemwide offer cap is reset from the high limit of $9,000/MWh to the low cap (the greater of $2,000/MWh or 50 times the daily effective fuel index price).

The ERCOT Protocols require the PNM threshold be set at three times the cost of new entry (CONE) for a power plant, historically a combustion turbine. The threshold has been $315,000/MW-year in recent years, but a Brattle Group report in December identified the latest CONE for a CT to be at $88,500/MW-year.

ERCOT has proposed the PNM threshold be reduced to $265,500/MW-year, which is three times the recently determined CONE.

“We’re taking something that came out of an academic exercise. This needs more vetting,” Reliant Energy Retail Services’ Bill Barnes said.

“Several of us have commented at the commission,” said Direct Energy’s Sandy Morris, representing the Independent Retail Electric Providers segment. “You might have a resolution from the commission. If we don’t hear from the commission, then we can proceed with what we hear here. That’s fine with me. … I want to see a lower CONE.”

ERCOT’s Dan Woodfin addresses the TAC at its March 27 meeting.

RTC Task Force to Begin Work April 4

The TAC endorsed the creation of a task force to establish market rules for implementing real-time co-optimization (RTC), which PUCT Chair DeAnn Walker hopes will bring “economic benefits that exceed its costs” and “operational benefits for ERCOT as well.” The PUC has directed ERCOT to proceed with RTC’s implementation (Project 48540).

The Real-Time Co-optimization Task Force (RTCTF) will be led by ERCOT Compliance Director Matt Mereness and Bryan Sams, director of regulatory affairs for Lone Star Transmission. Mereness will serve as either chair or co-chair alongside Sams, depending on the task force’s determination.

“It’s an honor to do this. It’s a big deal,” said Mereness, who promised up to three meetings a month. ERCOT has said it will take four or five years and about $40 million to implement RTC.

The RTCTF will report directly to the TAC and comprise stakeholders and staff from ERCOT, the PUC, the Independent Market Monitor and Office of Public Utility Counsel. It will hold its first meeting April 4.

ERCOT staff have said RTC will efficiently coordinate the provision of energy and ancillary services (AS) in the real-time market and price AS shortages according to their defined demand curves.

ERCOT Gathering Input for Storage Workshop

ERCOT staff briefly reviewed a list of issues to be discussed during an April 23 workshop on energy storage. Staff are still gathering input on the workshop, which will also include a brief overview of an April 25 workshop on inverter-based resources.

The PUC opened a rulemaking on energy storage ownership (Project 48023) following last year’s rejection of AEP Texas’ request to connect two West Texas battery storage facilities to the ERCOT grid. Transmission and distribution providers have squared off against generators over the devices’ ownership. (See “Commission Welcomes Legislative Input on Energy Storage,” Texas PUC Briefs: Jan. 17, 2019.)

TAC Approves RMS Leadership, 15 Revision Requests

The TAC approved American Electric Power’s Jim Lee as chair and Just Energy’s Eric Blakey as vice chair of the Retail Market Subcommittee, which serves as a forum for resolving retail market issues directly affecting ERCOT and its Protocols. Lee and Blakey are exchanging the positions they held through much of 2018, maintaining the RMS’ unofficial practice of having a utility representative and a retail electric provider representative share the leadership positions.

The committee also endorsed 11 Nodal Protocol revision requests (NPRRs), two changes to the Retail Market Guide (RMGRRs), one to the Resource Registration Glossary (RRGRR) and one system change request (SCR):

  • NPRR891: Removes the 50-kW threshold for non-opt-in entities to report unregistered distributed generation to ERCOT for its unregistered DG report.
  • NPRR900: Addresses inconsistencies in the current Nodal Protocol language that don’t align with current processes, PUC rules and system design.
  • NPRR906: Streamlines the Protocol language and removes ambiguity over how ERCOT systems handle the decision-making entity during security-constrained economic dispatch’s (SCED) mitigation processes.
  • NPRR908: Aligns RMG references and updates mass transition notification requirements for emergency qualified scheduling entities to match with RMGRR159’s revisions.
  • NPRR909: Resolves a gap in the Protocols by addressing the unplanned unavailability of emergency response service (ERS) loads and generators.
  • NPRR912: Addresses the settlement of switchable generation resources (SWGRs) that receive a reliability unit commitment instruction to switch from a non-ERCOT control area to the ERCOT control area. The change provides a make-whole payment for an SWGR when its real-time ERCOT revenues are not sufficient to cover certain specified costs the resource may have incurred in complying with the RUC instruction.
  • NPRR914: Adds data points unique to a controllable load resource available for dispatch service or dispatch with a real-time market bid to the existing 60-day SCED disclosure report.
  • NPRR916: Sets the mitigated offer floor to $0/MWh for “combined cycle” and “gas/oil steam and combustion turbine” resource categories, replacing the fuel index price-based calculation. The change also eliminates the grey-boxed language from NPRR664.
  • NPRR920: Modifies the resource ramp rate logic in the Protocols (Section 6.5.7.2, Resource Limit Calculator) to dynamically adjust the amount of ramp rate reserved for regulation service in real time based on the percentage of regulation service being deployed in the opposite direction.
  • NPRR922: Aligns the DC tie import forecast with forecasts of other resources in ERCOT’s Capacity, Demand and Reserves (CDR) report that are deployed during ERS and other energy emergency alert events. The revision also addresses a reporting gap in the CDR by specifying an approach for forecasting expected capacity imports for planned DC tie projects.
  • NPRR925: Increases the minimum quantity that can be submitted for point-to-point (PTP) obligation bids from 0.1 MW to 1 MW, matching the minimum quantity for energy-only offers and energy bids.
  • RMGRR158: Codifies competitive retailer responsibilities during an extended unplanned system outage.
  • RMGRR159: Clarifies the mass transition processes and communications by: shortening required minimum timelines for initial notification to affected parties from two hours to one hour; allowing preliminary notification of mass transition to affected transmission and distribution service providers, providers of last resort and PUC staff, as long as protected information is not disclosed; and clarifies that ERCOT may coordinate periodic testing of mass transition systems and processes with market participants.
  • RRGRR020: Corrects certain submittal requirement fields inadvertently left blank during RRGRR007’s implementation by replicating requirements from the full interconnect study column to the planning model column for the affected rows. The request does not add any new data requirements to the glossary.
  • SCR798: Introduces a limit on the total number of PTP obligation bids that can be submitted into the day-ahead market per qualified scheduling entity and per counter-party. The limit will apply to the number of bid IDs per operating day.

— Tom Kleckner

Energy MarketEnergy StorageERCOT Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)Generation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *