FERC last week clarified its Electric Quarterly Report (EQR) reporting requirements, emphasizing that transmission providers must report transmission-related data (RM01-8, et al.).
The order also updates the EQR Data Dictionary, effective with the report for the fourth quarter of 2016, clarifying reporting requirements and fields related to “Increment Name” and “Commencement Date of Contract Terms.” It also makes changes regarding the “Time Zone” field options and deletes fields for reporting e-Tag data.
Future minor or non-material changes to EQR reporting requirements and the Data Dictionary will be posted directly to the commission’s website, and EQR users will be alerted via email of the changes.
FERC last week denied a request by PJM’s Independent Market Monitor to clarify or rehear a March order in which the commission found fault with the RTO’s use of the cost-based energy offer cap as the sole measure of short-run marginal cost in calculating capacity market caps (EL14-94, ER16-1291).
In its request, Monitoring Analytics generally supported FERC’s order but called flawed the use of market-based offers as the measure of short-run marginal costs when they are higher than cost-based offers.
“The Market Monitor contends that the extent to which a market-based offer exceeds a cost-based offer constitutes a markup, and markup is not part of a competitive offer,” the commission said.
“We continue to find that, with limited exceptions, PJM should use, for the purpose of calculating a unit-specific capacity market offer cap, a resource’s non-zero market-based offer to reflect its marginal costs,” FERC ruled. “Simply because a market-based offer exceeds a cost-based offer does not necessarily establish that the market-based offer fails to reflect a resource’s marginal costs.”
The March ruling stemmed from a 2014 FirstEnergy petition that said PJM’s Market Monitor was violating the Tariff by calculating marginal costs using the lower of the market-based offer and cost-based offer.
FERC Denies Rehearing on Order Requiring DR in Capacity Auctions
FERC denied Talen Energy’s request for rehearing of a July 22 order that required PJM to include demand response in its transition auctions for Capacity Performance (ER15-623, EL15-80).
The commission also accepted a compliance filing by PJM in response to the July 22 order.
Talen had sought to apply a ruling by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that voided FERC’s jurisdiction over DR in energy markets. However, the Supreme Court later reversed that ruling. (See Supreme Court Upholds FERC Jurisdiction over DR.)
“Accordingly, we dismiss Talen’s rehearing request as moot,” FERC said.
FERC also dismissed an objection by the Advanced Energy Management Alliance Coalition regarding the method PJM proposed to measure and verify DR participation in the transition auctions, saying it was an unrelated issue.
Commissioner Tony Clark concurred in a separate statement.
“I write separately to note my policy and procedural disagreements with the underlying order as fully explained in my separate statement of July 22, 2015,” he said.
Clark dissented from that order, saying it was improper procedurally because the commission had previously approved “unambiguous” Tariff language barring DR and energy efficiency from the auctions.
CAISO transmission planning staff last week proposed studies on the implications of gas shortages on grid reliability.
The planners outlined the studies in a June 13 stakeholder call, saying they will consider the risks to Northern California as well as the more vulnerable southern part of the state.
The disparity between the regions stems from design differences in their pipeline systems and the synergy between Southern California’s storage facilities and its pipeline network.
“Gas storage in the [Los Angeles] Basin is critical [to pipeline operations],” said ISO senior advisor David Le, referring to the gas system’s dependence on the Aliso Canyon storage facility.
Le pointed out that the Aliso Canyon — closed earlier this year because of a gas leak — is vital not only for its massive 86 Bcf storage capacity, but also for its ability to quickly supply large volumes of gas to support pipeline pressure.
Aliso Canyon usually accounts for more than 65% of the inventory held in Southern California’s four major storage sites. The facility also boasts a daily withdrawal capacity of 1.86 Bcf, which helps keep 17 gas-fired generators in the basin supplied with gas under strained conditions.
That withdrawal capability is usually tapped during summer months to help generators meet peak demand. CAISO says that, because of the “magnitude and speed” of the generators’ consumption, pipeline capacity is often insufficient to supply their needs without the ability to backfill from storage such as Aliso Canyon.
CAISO plans to model multiple scenarios stemming from the closure of Aliso Canyon to assess the potential long-term impact of the gas system’s balancing act on Southern California’s grid reliability. Planning staff will develop scenarios in which gas pipeline operators and gas generators lose access to other storage facilities in the region in addition to Aliso.
The study is intended to take a long view, looking at the implications of such gas curtailments to inform transmission planning for 2021 and 2026 as California advances on its 50% renewables mandate.
A parallel study would examine the likelihood for gas curtailments in Northern California, a region with a “much different” gas system, according to Binaya Shrestha, CAISO regional transmission engineer lead.
To provide context for his assertion, Shrestha pointed to the February 2011 gas outages that cut supplies to a number of San Diego-area generators. “Southern California is [subject to] historical outages, but in Northern California, there hasn’t been any curtailment of that level for gas-fired plants,” he said.
That success can be attributed in part to both the line capacity and topology of the gas system.
The proximity of gas storage facilities to Northern California’s backbone pipeline provides flexibility for the region’s gas system.
The region’s backbone pipeline — Line 401/402 — has a firm capacity of more than 2 Bcfd. Additional supply arrives via the Mojave gas system originating in the southern part of the state, which serves about 2,200 MW of generation in the ISO’s Pacific Gas and Electric zone.
Furthermore, nearly all of Northern California’s eight major gas storage facilities are distributed along the length of Line 401/402. That arrangement provides operational flexibility because gas can be injected into the system from multiple sites.
Those facilities also equip the region’s gas suppliers with a combined 238 Bcf in inventory capacity — double that in Southern California — and more than 4.5 Bcf in withdrawal capacity.
Still, the ISO wants to better understand the dynamics of gas supply in Northern California to investigate what chain of events leading to curtailments could compromise the region’s electric reliability.
Stakeholders must submit comments about the gas-electric studies by June 27. Findings will be incorporated into the ISO’s draft transmission plan early next year.
WASHINGTON — RTOs will be required to align their settlement and dispatch intervals and implement shortage pricing during any shortage period under new price formation rules approved last week by FERC (RM15-24).
FERC Order 825 requires RTOs to settle real-time energy, operating reserves and intertie transactions in the same time interval it dispatches, prices and schedules them, respectively. Although all RTOs currently dispatch resources in five-minute intervals, ISO-NE, MISO and PJM settle those transactions based on the average price for all dispatch intervals during the hour.
This misalignment distorts price signals, as compensation is based on average hourly prices rather than specific periods, including those of greatest need. “These distorted price signals can mute a resource’s financial reward for being able to quickly respond to system needs and create a disincentive for resources to respond to price signals,” Stanley Wolf, of FERC’s Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, said at the commission’s open meeting Thursday.
Additionally, in some RTOs, an energy or reserve shortage is required to last a minimum amount of time before shortage pricing is triggered. “Due to such delays, short-term prices fail to reflect potential reliability costs, as well as fail to reflect the value of both internal and external market resources responding to a dispatch signal,” Wolf said.
Commissioner Colette Honorable called the order — the first final rule in the commission’s efforts to reform price formation in the organized electricity markets — a “milestone.” The commission began evaluating price formation in 2014 and issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in September. (See NOPR Requires RTOs Switch to 5-Minute Settlements.)
“These requirements will help ensure that rates for energy and operating reserves are just and reasonable and will align prices with resource dispatch instructions and operating needs, provide appropriate incentives for resource performance and maintain reliability,” FERC said.
The final order clarifies that the rules would apply to all supply resources, including demand response.
The new requirements take effect 75 days after publication in the Federal Register. Each RTO will be required to make a compliance filing 120 days after that detailing the tariff changes needed to implement the new rules. The order stipulates that FERC will allow an additional year after the compliance filing deadline for the settlement interval changes to go into effect, while it will allow another 120 days for the shortage pricing changes.
“I know that it will take some time and effort for the RTOs to comply with the portion of the rule on settlement intervals; it won’t necessarily be easy,” Commissioner Cheryl LaFleur said. “However, I think it’s critically important that markets send clear, accurate, timely and undiluted price signals.”
A U.S. House of Representatives committee last week approved legislation that aims to stop Clean Line Energy Partners’ plans to build a 700-mile HVDC transmission through Oklahoma and Arkansas.
Womack
The House Committee on Natural Resources advanced the Assuring Private Property Rights Over Vast Access to Land (APPROVAL) Act by a 19-11 vote June 15. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Steve Womack, one of the members of an all-Republican Arkansas congressional delegation that is united in opposition to the Clean Line project.
The bill would amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to prohibit the secretary of energy and federal power agencies from using eminent domain for transmission rights of way without first receiving approval from a state’s governor and regulatory body. It also restricts the transmission line’s siting to existing federal right of way or land managed by federal entities.
Womack said the bill is “another positive step toward passage in a long and hard-fought battle to allow states to retain the historic precedent of authority for interstate transmission projects.”
“It is our firm belief that the [Energy Department] has overstepped its bounds, and reversing this decision through the passage of the APPROVAL Act remains a top priority,” Womack said, speaking for the rest of his state’s delegation.
Houston-based Clean Line issued an opposing statement, saying that if the bill became law, “it would kill jobs by creating significant barriers to the many businesses in Arkansas … that build American infrastructure, as well as raise electric power costs.”
“Denying American consumers access to the lowest-cost clean energy resources is never good policy,” added Clean Line, which noted more than $100 million in private funds have been invested in the project.
Clean Line’s Plains & Eastern Clean Line is a $2.5 billion, privately funded project that is supposed to deliver 4,000 MW of wind power from the Oklahoma Panhandle through Arkansas to the Mississippi River. The line would interconnect with the Tennessee Valley Authority near Memphis, after first dropping off 500 MW at a converter station in central Arkansas.
Clean Line Project Map Source: Clean Line Energy Partners
Clean Line proposed the project in response to the Energy Department’s 2010 request for proposals for transmission projects under Section 1222 of EPACT 2005, which authorizes the department to participate in “designing, developing, constructing, operating, maintaining or owning” new transmission.
The department approved the project in March, saying it would participate through the Southwestern Power Administration, a federal agency that markets hydroelectric power from 24 dams in six states. (See DOE Agrees to Join Clean Line’s Plains & Eastern Project.)
The Arkansas Sierra Club said it opposes Womack’s bill.
“The Clean Line project has been in the works since 2010 and has undergone a very thorough and expensive public permitting process in accordance with federal law,” said the Sierra Club’s Arkansas director, Glen Hooks. “Rep. Womack’s bill seeks to change that law after the permitting process has been underway for years. That’s not only bad for our state’s air and economy, it’s blatantly unfair to the company.”
Arkansas Sen. John Boozman has filed a matching bill that is co-sponsored by the state’s junior senator, Tom Cotton. The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources held a hearing on the bill in May but has taken no action on it since then.
“Arkansans should be heard in discussions that impact their lands,” Boozman said in a statement released by his office. “Our bill restores the role of states, which in the past had the freedom to approve or reject electric transmission projects. These decisions should not be made behind the closed doors of a federal agency in Washington, D.C.”
MISO has almost finalized its Clean Power Plan analysis after incorporating stakeholder feedback.
Senior Policy Studies Engineer Jordan Bakke said MISO integrated most comments and corrections from five stakeholder groups. The RTO also added an executive summary, reorganized the report for clarity and added explanations on modeling methods and assumptions before sections presenting detailed results.
MISO didn’t accept all stakeholder recommendations, rejecting a request not to take a position on the most inexpensive compliance strategies. The RTO has concluded that a mass-based plan would be less costly than a rate-based plan. (See MISO: Mass-Based CPP Plan 1/3 Cost of Rate-Based.) It said that it “simply laid out … observations and indicated the conditions that are needed for the different compliance implementations.”
“We wanted to stay away from absolute statements on which compliance methods should be used,” Bakke said.
MISO also declined to compare its study with CPP studies by other RTOs, saying the purpose of its study is an independent analysis of its member states.
“As we are not active participants in other studies, a comparison would be best conducted by a third party and should be kept outside the scope of MISO’s report,” the RTO said.
Bakke said MISO and PJM would begin to jointly scope an evaluation of CPP compliance along the MISO-PJM seam in late July.
“We haven’t decided exactly what the study will look like,” Bakke said. “It will be somewhat limited in nature. We want to focus on what is the impact of the two regions coming together” with possibly divergent compliance methods and trading programs.
MISO will finalize the report after reviewing stakeholder input on the executive summary, which is due July 1.
MTEP 17 Futures Process Enters Stakeholder Inspection
MISO is seeking input on a complex approach to the Transmission Expansion Plan 2017 (MTEP 17) futures analysis that relies on stakeholders weighting the probability that particular developments will occur.
The weightings would reflect RTO staff and member consensus on the relative probability and impact of future economic and policy conditions to assess the cost-effectiveness of different transmission solutions.
MISO is proposing to use a 30% weighting for existing trends, 40% for policy regulations and 30% for accelerated alternative technologies.
Matt Ellis, senior transmission planning engineer, said MISO’s North and South zones will use a single set of weights for the MTEP 17 scope.
He said carbon reduction regulation is the single biggest unknown in the 2017 weighting process, but reductions are likely to advance regardless of policy decision.
“Even with the [CPP] stay, we see our members going forward with compliance plans,” Ellis said. “We see regulations aren’t the ceiling — they’re the floor.”
MISO is asking sector representatives to complete a futures weighting feedback form by June 29.
RTO officials also launched a third and final stakeholder comment period for the MTEP 17 generation siting process, a prediction of where resources will be built that is intended to guide future transmission expansion.
MISO is proposing to prioritize sites associated with generators in the interconnection queue without a signed agreement, existing brownfield sites, and sites for retired and mothballed generation that have not been redeveloped.
Ellis said mothballed sites usually contain infrastructure that can be reused and will be considered before greenfield sites, for which planners have to ask, “‘Is it close to a natural gas pipe? What sort of distance to load does it have?’”
MISO won’t site thermal units in National Ambient Air Quality Standards nonattainment areas in the South region unless nearby coal units retire.
For wind siting, MISO will expand beyond sites provided by the existing Regional Generator Outlet Study (RGOS) because of the possibility that wind additions will surpass renewable portfolio standards. Renewable planning firm Vibrant Clean Energy said that by combining RGOS Zone wind capacity and active and withdrawn wind projects in the queue, MISO could site about 50 GW of new wind projects, with the potential to site an additional 34 GW.
The RTO is also considering adding zonal resource adequacy requirements into MTEP 17 futures to ensure that it meets both local clearing requirements and the current North/South 1,000-MW transfer restriction.
MISO will also site commercial and industrial demand response near the 10 busiest industrial buses and residential DR near the 10 busiest nonindustrial buses in each local balancing area. Distributed generation will be similarly sited by using data from the top 10 load buses in each local balancing area.
The RTO is asking for stakeholders to comment on proposed siting methodology by June 29. It will address the overall MTEP 17 study scope during the July 20 PAC meeting.
Duff-Coleman Proposals due July 6
Proposals for the Duff-Coleman transmission project — MISO’s first competitively bid transmission line — are due July 6. The RTO will select a developer by Dec. 30.
Brian Pedersen, senior manager of competitive transmission administration, said MISO will accept proposals from qualified developers who have provided a $100,000 deposit.
MISO will begin considering proposals once they are submitted, even if they are turned in ahead of the bid deadline. It will post a list of bidders by Aug. 19.
The state’s cap-and-trade system faces an uncertain future after just 11% of available carbon allowances were sold during last month’s quarterly auction, generating only 2% of expected revenues. Some analysts attribute the surplus of allowances to other state programs that effectively limit utilities’ emissions and their demand for allowances.
Questions also loom about whether cap and trade can continue beyond 2020 without explicit authorization from the state legislature, which last year failed to pass a bill that would have extended the program.
The California Chamber of Commerce continues to challenge the program in court, contending that the allowance system effectively constitutes a tax, which should have been implemented only with a super-majority vote by the legislature.
Arthur H. House, chairman of the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, told a business group that utilities are likely targets of attacks by computer hackers.
House on Thursday spoke to the Connecticut Business and Industry Association’s conference in Farmington, explaining PURA’s recent cybersecurity report that encourages a cooperative cybersecurity plan between the state and utilities. Part of the plan is to conduct closed-door talks with utilities outside of the regulatory system to maintain security of sensitive information.
“There will be a cyberattack on our utilities,” House said. “The questions are, when will it happen and how we will be able to manage it?”
The D.C. Public Service Commission on Friday unanimously upheld its decision to allow Exelon to purchase Pepco Holdings Inc.
While maintaining her opposition to the merger itself, Chairwoman Betty Ann Kane said the commission acted within the law in approving the deal and that there was no basis for rehearing.
Opponents Public Citizen and D.C. Solar United Neighborhoods, who had asked for a rehearing, said they will take their appeal to court. Meanwhile, D.C. People’s Counsel Sandra Mattavous-Frye said her office is reviewing the decision before deciding whether to challenge it. (See District, OPC Ask PSC to Reconsider Exelon-PHI Merger.)
Court Rejects Net Metering Extension to Community Solar
A state court of appeals ruled that Commonwealth Edison isn’t required to extend net metering rates to community solar projects in a defeat for a consumer protection group and the Environmental Defense Fund.
The Citizens Utility Board and the EDF had requested the Commerce Commission apply net metering rates to customers who signed on to community solar projects. ComEd opposed the request, and the ICC agreed, saying the Public Utilities Act prohibits the commission from issuing such a mandate. On appeal, the 1st District Appellate Court upheld the commission’s dismissal.
“The commission is an administrative agency responsible for setting utility rates, whose powers and duties are set forth in the act,” the court wrote. “Consequently, we give substantial deference to the commission’s decisions in light of its expertise in the area of utility ratemaking.”
Proposed Entergy Plant Draws Backlash from Neighbors
Entergy’s proposal to build a new generation unit at a brownfield site in Eastern New Orleans is drawing heated opposition even before any formal plans have been filed. Nearly 50 community leaders, consumer advocates and environmental activists gathered June 15 at a New Orleans City Council public hearing to speak against the new natural gas-fired plant.
Entergy New Orleans has not officially asked the council to approve its plans, but earlier this year it identified the new unit as a key investment in its long-term power generation plan. The company shuttered the aging 918-MW Michoud power plant earlier this year and hopes to build a fast-starting 250-MW combustion turbine at the site. A formal filing is expected soon.
New Orleans East residents are concerned the plant would pollute their neighborhoods and contribute to sinking land. Opponents also argue Entergy is not making a big enough effort to embrace energy efficiency and renewable sources in its planning.
The Public Service Commission has approved regulations setting the foundation for a community solar pilot program that will go into effect next month.
The program will focus on providing renewable energy benefits for low- and moderate-income consumers.
The three-year pilot aims to provide access to solar-generated electricity to all state customers, without requiring ownership of the systems, and attract investment in the state’s renewable infrastructure and green economy.
Lawmakers Consider Renewable Energy ‘Goals,’ not Mandates
Kurmas
The House and Senate energy committees are proposing new renewable energy goals, rather than a new renewable portfolio standard, even as the state’s two major utilities say they would support new mandates.
A Senate bill would set a 35% renewable goal by 2025, while House legislation includes a 30% goal by 2025. Neither plan includes penalties if the targets aren’t met. The current RPS mandates 10% renewables by 2015.
While some lawmakers are opposed to renewable mandates, large utilities say they would comply. Steve Kurmas, vice chairman of DTE Energy, said the utility “will build incremental renewables with or without a mandate.” David Mengebier, senior vice president of governmental and public affairs for Consumers Energy, said the company would be “OK” with mandates.
Minnesota Power said it will study the implications of reducing its coal reliance after the Public Utilities Commission approved the utility’s 15-year resource plan, which calls for more investments in wind, solar and natural gas and the retirement of coal units at two plants.
Under the plan, the Taconite Harbor plant in Schroeder would discontinue coal use by 2020, and two coal-fired units at the Clay Boswell plant in Cohasset would shut down in 2022.
The PUC asked that the Duluth-based utility study its changing resource mix. Minnesota Power, which now relies upon coal for 75% of its power, plans to transition to equal one-third parts coal, renewables and natural gas. A decade ago, Minnesota Power’s portfolio was 95% coal.
City Utility, KCP&L Reach Settlement over Tx Usage
Kansas City Power and Light will pay the City of Independence’s utility nearly $12 million in installments during the next four years to settle a disagreement over transmission costs.
The case stems from Independence Power and Light’s decision to change its status with SPP from non-transmission owner to transmission owner last year. That meant new rates whenever SPP used IPL’s transmission system. Independence had billed KCP&L for an annual transmission revenue requirement of $7.2 million, and KCP&L objected to the higher rate.
NorthWestern Asks PSC to Halve Mandated Solar Rates
NorthWestern Energy asked the Public Service Commission to cut the amount it is mandated to pay to commercial solar projects of 3 MW or less. The utility told the PSC that the mandated price to qualified facilities is too high and is hurting consumers.
NorthWestern wants the current rate cut in half and the contracts shortened. The state’s rate is $66/MWh, similar to the price the company gets for its own hydroelectric power.
The solar projects are each capable of powering about 540 homes, and there are more than 80 on the current docket, NorthWestern said. “For each 3-MW project, the differential between the QF rate and the rate we propose is about $5 million per solar contract,” said John Alke, a NorthWestern attorney. The contracts run 25 years.
A state judge expressed alarm last week at the estimated 200 million gallons of contaminated water seeping annually from leaky ash-storage ponds at the Coltstrip power plant and allowed a lawsuit challenging the state’s enforcement efforts to proceed.
District Judge Robert Deschamps rejected arguments from Department of Environmental Quality officials that they were appropriately managing the problem. A 2012 deal between regulators and Talen Energy, Colstrip’s manager, was intended to clean up decades of contamination of underground drinking water supplies. Under a separate settlement, the plant’s six owners paid $25 million to Colstrip residents whose water was fouled by the plant’s ash ponds.
Environmentalist groups are challenging the 2012 agreement, which set few deadlines for action and could entail years of further study.
The New Hampshire Electric Cooperative is the first buyer of power produced by the Antrim Wind project. The cooperative will purchase 25% of the $65 million project’s output, or about 7.2 MW.
The 20-year agreement represents about 3% of the cooperative’s total demand. The 5.4 cents/kWh its customers pay for generation is among the state’s lowest. The cooperative said the power will help it meet its mandate under the state’s renewable portfolio standard and its own goal of having 25% of its demand served by renewable energy by 2025.
Construction is to begin later this year with operations starting by the end of 2017.
Regulators approved the first rate increases in four years for Rochester Gas & Electric and New York State Electric and Gas customers. The increases are effective July 1 and will be phased in over two years.
A typical RG&E electricity customer would pay $1.10 more per month beginning in July, another $2.39/month a year after and a third increase of $2.84/month in July 2018. NYSEG customers would see monthly increases totaling $5.75/month by July 2018.
Part of RG&E’s increase would help pay for the Ginna Retirement Transmission Alternative that is intended to mitigate the possible closure of the Ginna nuclear power plant. RG&E electric customers already are paying a $2.20/month surcharge to keep Ginna operating until March to maintain system reliability.
Two state legislators introduced a bill last week that would force PSEG-Long Island to separate electricity purchasing planning from system management to reduce what the lawmakers believe is a conflict of interest.
Assembly members Fred Thiele Jr. and Dean Murray introduced legislation to separate the functions, saying that PSEG-LI may face conflicts of interest because it produces power from its own units. The utility has recommended that the Long Island Power Authority not buy power from a planned 750-MW Caithness power plant, which it said is not needed.
PSEG-LI took over managing the electric grid on Long Island from the Long Island Power Authority last January. It was also instructed to develop plans to purchase power.
Roanoke River Basin Files Coal Ash Suit Against Duke
The Roanoke River Basin Association has filed another lawsuit against Duke Energy over its coal ash management, this one alleging that Duke’s Mayo power plant violated the federal Clean Water Act.
The suit alleges that 6.9 million tons of ash from the plant have contaminated Mayo Lake, wetlands and groundwater.
The group has filed a similar suit against Duke over its Buck plant. The filings claim that state and federal officials aren’t properly enforcing environmental laws.
The Public Service Commission last week unanimously approved the contentious $250 million, 87-turbine Brady Wind Energy Center I. The NextEra Energy Resources project will provide 150 MW of power for Basin Electric Power Cooperative.
The project faced stiff opposition and went through the longest hearing for a proposed wind farm in state history, with 15 hours of testimony on March 31. The PSC also consented to construction of a 19-mile transmission line.
NextEra expects construction to begin this month, with the project scheduled to be completed by the end of the year. The project is part of a proposed two-phase wind complex in the state’s southwest. The PSC is still considering the application for the adjoining 150-MW Brady Wind II project, which calls for 72 turbines.
A Public Utilities Commission nominating committee pared down a list of nine candidates to four to fill a vacancy, and now the final selection will be made by Gov. John Kasich.
The final four are Sam Gerhardstein, former director of government affairs at Columbia Gas of Ohio; Dave Hall, a state Republican legislator who sits on the House Public Utilities Committee; Howard Petricoff, an energy attorney who recently retired; and Gregory Williams, an attorney who served as Kasich’s senior law clerk in 2011.
State regulators approved infrastructure improvement plans for FirstEnergy’s four Pennsylvania utilities, which will allow the utilities to recover the costs through customer charges effective July 1.
The Public Utility Commission’s decision affects customers of Pennsylvania Power, West Penn Power, Metropolitan Edison and Pennsylvania Electric.
Under the plan, Penn Power expects a 0.3% increase in distribution charges; Penelec will boost charges 0.04%; Met-Ed will implement a 0.03% hike; and West Penn Power will increase charges by 0.06%.
Gov. Peter Shumlin signed a renewable energy bill that gives “substantial deference” to towns where renewable projects would be located.
The legislation was based in large part on the recommendations of the Solar Siting Task Force to give localities more say in the Public Service Board permitting process for projects that have been determined to meet the state’s energy and climate goals.
The General Assembly passed the bill on June 9 after a previous version of energy siting legislation was vetoed by Shumlin over concerns of the unintended effects of new wind sound standards.
Dominion Plan to Bury Power Lines Met with Skepticism
The State Corporation Commission questioned Dominion Virginia Power’s request for a $140 million proposal to bury its most vulnerable power lines to decrease outages.
The project, which would put about 400 miles of distribution lines underground during the first phase, would increase customers’ bills by about $6/year. Commissioners questioned whether the same result could be achieved through other, less expensive efforts, such as tree trimming.
The utility originally asked state regulators to approve a $263 million plan. The commission is expected to rule in the next few weeks.
Madison Mayor Paul Soglin last week introduced two residential solar programs intended to ease the cost of panel purchase and installation.
The first program, MadiSUN Group Buy for Rooftop Solar, allows residents to band together and use the city’s competitive bidding process to secure inexpensive bids from prequalified service providers. The city is now recruiting households for the program.
The second program, a partnership with a local credit union, allows residents to finance all of their solar-related expenses at a low fixed rate.
FERC last week granted PacifiCorp’s request to suspend the relicensing proceeding for the 169-MW Klamath Hydroelectric Project in order to give the utility more time to transfer the facility to new owners ahead of the removal of four dams (Project No. 2082-027).
The fate of the project — which straddles the California-Oregon border along the Klamath River — became the subject of negotiations among state and federal agencies, Native American tribes, environmental groups and local farmers in 2008. Two years later, PacifiCorp reached a settlement agreement to remove four of the project’s dams, contingent on passage of federal legislation authorizing the removal.
Congressional inaction triggered dispute resolution proceedings early this year, resulting in PacifiCorp agreeing to transfer the project’s license to a new entity — the Klamath River Renewal Corp. — in July. That entity is expected to immediately file with FERC to surrender and remove the dams under the commission’s process, rather than await approval from Congress.
“Requiring the parties, other stakeholders and commission staff to simultaneously proceed with both a relicensing proceeding and a transfer and surrender proceeding would be burdensome and an inefficient use of resources,” the commission said in its ruling.
The Irongate Dam is one of four scheduled to be removed from the Klamath River. Source: American Rivers
FERC last week accepted a NextEra Energy compliance filing revising a tariff for two transmission projects the company has been awarded through CAISO’s competitive selection process (ER15-2239-002).
The commission agreed with NextEra’s explanation that the tariff’s formula rate would only apply a 150-basis-point adder to an initial assessment of the long-term cost of debt for the projects — a figure based on the company’s debt cost for a Texas project. The adder, the company clarified, would be recalculated once long-term debt is actually issued.
The commission also rejected a request by the California State Water Project that NextEra’s tariff clarify the term “third-party debt,” ruling that the argument was outside the scope of the proceeding.
“The commission has repeatedly held that compliance filings are limited to the specific directives of the commission’s order,” the commission wrote. “The sole issue on review is whether the filing party has complied with those directives.”
NEW YORK — Organized markets are being distorted because of policymakers’ failure to price carbon, two grid operator CEOs and a former FERC and state commissioner told a New York Energy Week audience last week.
“I would say that in my … 16 years, this is the most vulnerable that I’ve seen the market construct yet,” ISO-NE CEO Gordon van Welie told more than 75 industry participants at Goldman Sachs’ office in lower Manhattan.
Van Welie appeared on a panel with NYISO CEO Brad Jones and former FERC and Pennsylvania Public Utility Commissioner Nora Brownell, who both joined van Welie in lamenting that CO2 emissions remain a market externality. The conference was created in 2013 by EnerKnol, an energy policy research and data company.
Left to right: Moderator Rich Heidorn Jr., RTO Insider; Gordon van Welie, ISO-NE; Brad Jones, NYISO; former FERC Commissioner Nora Mead Brownell Copyright: New York Energy Week
“We value what nuclear brings to the table” as a baseload, low-carbon resource, Jones said. “But our markets don’t.”
Asked about Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s proposed zero emission credits for upstate New York nuclear units, Jones said, “We’d like to see that be temporary in nature … a bridge into a future where the market can really resolve these issues.”
Obvious Solution
Brownell was blunt.
“We don’t have the leadership to deal with the obvious solution, which is a carbon tax. It’s straightforward, it’s transparent, it sends the right market signals,” said Brownell, who served on FERC from 2001 to 2006. “The market signals are there; we’re not allowing them to really work. And the more we create these constructs, the more we ultimately distort markets.”
Van Welie said the lack of carbon pricing is putting the public policy of achieving reliability through wholesale markets in conflict with that for reducing carbon emissions.
Allowing resources with “out-of-market” contracts under state clean energy procurements to offer into the capacity market will distort price formation, said van Welie. “And that really creates a problem in terms of ensuring reliability, but it also creates a problem with regard to the long-term incentive in the market as well.”
‘Fundamental Questions’
Brownell said the conflict raises “fundamental questions.”
“Do we really value markets, and have we done a sufficient job of illustrating the economic benefits of markets?
“Secondly, what is the role of the RTO? We have piled on … to what was originally a pretty straightforward economic dispatch reliability model. I’m not saying they are incapable of doing this; I just wonder if they are the best entity to do it. Or we are burdening them to the point where they really can’t do their fundamental job well, which is ultimately and critically important to both economic development and the environment in which we live.”
Building Infrastructure
Brad Jones, NYISO Copyright: New York Energy Week
Jones and van Welie also shared their challenges in building the electric and gas infrastructure needed to meet reliability and environmental goals.
Jones noted that it has historically taken 10 to 12 years to get new transmission approved, sited and constructed in New York.
Based on that, he said, the ISO “would have two years remaining in our 14 years to interconnect everything into the system to meet the [2030 state goal of 50% renewables]. That is not possible. We have to improve our ability to move these projects through the system.
“Given that we have a single siting authority, it does give us the advantage to begin to streamline that process,” he added.
For the six-state ISO-NE, siting issues are compounded by cost allocation disagreements.
Unlike the “singular objective” that made the region’s $12 billion transmission buildout for reliability possible, there is less consensus on transmission to deliver renewables, said van Welie.
Part of the problem is that some renewable developers are trying to connect in weak parts of the region’s grid. “Up in Maine, we have 3,000 MW of wind projects trying to interconnect to a transmission system designed to serve 300 MW of load,” van Welie said.
“We’ve spoken to the developers and said, ‘Why don’t we do a cluster study and why don’t you guys sort of get together and pool your money and all share in this investment that’s required and we can get you all connected?’ They don’t want to do that.
“And then we turn around to the states and say, ‘There’s a bunch of wind developers up here in Maine, some of which have actually signed contracts with you,’ he continued. “‘Can’t we get you guys to pay for some transmission to integrate them?’ And we can’t get that to happen either. And so we’re stuck, quite honestly.”
Van Welie said he has some hope that state clean energy solicitations will break the log jam.
“Maybe they’ll choose one that’s up in Maine and we’ll actually resolve this problem,” he said. “If they don’t, I think we’re going to remain stuck.”
Cost Allocation
Complicating New England’s transmission challenge is the Order 1000 cost allocation methodology approved by FERC. “The northern states don’t agree with the cost allocation and they’re the ones that would have to site these transmission projects,” van Welie said. “Ultimately I think we’re going to do something like what Texas did” with its Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ), he said.
Jones, who worked for ERCOT and Luminant before joining NYISO last year, said he sees lessons in how Texas and California — other single-state ISOs — were able to build renewables.
“In order to meet this aggressive goal, we have to begin identifying in advance where we think some of these renewables will locate. And then by that identification we can begin to build out a collector system, which allows those renewables to feed into the market,” he said. “We have to begin to remove some of that risk that is … on the developers by building out transmission to locations where we think there’s a high probability for those developers to come.”
Gas-Electric
For New England, the challenge of upgrading the transmission grid is compounded by its stressed natural gas infrastructure. This is a concern, van Welie said, because gas will be needed to balance renewables for the next “several decades,” until storage becomes more affordable.
“One of the most vexing problems we have is this disconnect between how the gas industry is regulated and the electric industry is regulated,” he said. “I think we all launched into wholesale markets 15 years ago thinking that the markets would do a great job of optimizing existing infrastructure, and of course they’ve done that. But we have now pushed the gas system to the limit.”
“So there’s nobody looking out to say, ‘How do we plan the gas system to be able to make efficient fuel delivery to the electric system?’ When we’ve approached the FERC on this issue, basically they’re boxed in because of the Federal Power Act.”
Brownell echoed van Welie’s concern, urging “integrated planning.”
“We need to look at the entire infrastructure needed. Texas [CREZ] worked. It just totally worked. … We just cannot continue to do things state by state, silo by silo, policy by policy,” she said.
Distributed Generation, New York REV
The panelists also gave their views on distributed generation, New York’s Reforming the Energy Vision initiative and its proposed rewrite of the utility revenue model.
“The debate about the big or the small grid [being] either/or is not really a debate that I buy into,” Jones said. “It really has to be both. We can’t … have a large renewable program and then trust that all that will be developed in rooftops. … To get the efficiencies out of building renewables in a way that just doesn’t cost too much for all of our customers, we need to do that in large scale. And so a lot of that large-scale [generation] will be a distance away from our [load] so it really has to be a combination of both the big grid and the small grid.”
Former FERC & PA PUC Commissioner Nora Brownell Copyright: New York Energy Week
Brownell, who served on the Pennsylvania commission (1997-2001) when it eliminated utilities’ monopolies and adopted customer choice, and now serves on the board of National Grid, was asked her reaction to the New York Public Service Commission’s May order seeking to change the utility revenue model.
Instead of earning returns on investments in large, centralized power systems, utilities would have “earnings opportunities” based on their performance as a “platform” enabling distributed resources and other new technologies. (See NY REV Order Revamps Utility Business Model.)
“Utilities cannot deny that the business model is changing with them or without them,” she said. “So I think there is real leadership among some — not all — to be part of that solution.
“The challenge is that if you’re going to have performance metrics — and we’ve seen them in the U.K.; they’ve worked for years — they need to be clear, they need to be measurable. You can’t have what you had in the telecom industry, which was: ‘We’ll give you extra money for doing the following 10 things, but we’re not going to really measure whether you’ve done them.’”
Mike Kormos, who abruptly resigned in March from his post as PJM executive vice president and chief operations officer, began a job last week as Exelon’s president of wholesale markets and energy policy.
Kormos copyright RTO Insider
“Mike brings extensive knowledge of the wholesale electricity markets,” said Joe Dominguez, executive vice president of governmental and regulatory affairs and public policy. “His expertise in market innovation and design … will strengthen Exelon’s policy efforts as we continue to advocate for market reforms that will benefit our customers, our communities and our companies.” (See Exelon to Close Quad Cities, Clinton Nuclear Plants.)
Kormos was with PJM for 27 years, and last year he sought to replace retiring CEO Terry Boston. The post went to Andy Ott, who long had been Kormos’ equal on the organizational chart. (See Kormos Marks Quarter Century Mark at PJM.)
At the time of Kormos’ resignation, Ott said his position would not be filled. Ott this month announced organizational changes, assigning Kormos’ duties overseeing the Operations Division to Senior Vice President Stu Bresler. (See Ott Restructures PJM Divisions, Leadership.)
In his new role, Kormos will be in charge of formulating and furthering Exelon’s positions on energy and transmission bulk system policy planning, developing effective wholesale energy markets, overseeing the company’s participation in NERC initiatives and monitoring grid reliability issues, including cybersecurity, the company said.
Kormos, who will report to Dominguez, has served on several boards, including the Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative, Reliability First Corp. and Eastern Interconnect Data Sharing Network.
He holds a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Drexel University and earned an MBA from Villanova University.
The state’s cap-and-trade system faces an uncertain future after just 11% of available carbon allowances were sold during last month’s quarterly auction, generating only 2% of expected revenues. Some analysts attribute the surplus of allowances to other state programs that effectively limit utilities’ emissions and their demand for allowances.
A state court of appeals ruled that Commonwealth Edison isn’t required to extend net metering rates to community solar projects in a defeat for a consumer protection group and the Environmental Defense Fund.
The Public Service Commission has approved regulations setting the foundation for a community solar pilot program that will go into effect next month.
Minnesota Power said it will study the implications of reducing its coal reliance after the Public Utilities Commission approved the utility’s 15-year resource plan, which calls for more investments in wind, solar and natural gas and the retirement of coal units at two plants.
Kansas City Power and Light will pay the City of Independence’s utility nearly $12 million in installments during the next four years to settle a disagreement over transmission costs.
NorthWestern Energy asked the Public Service Commission to cut the amount it is mandated to pay to commercial solar projects of 3 MW or less. The utility told the PSC that the mandated price to qualified facilities is too high and is hurting consumers.
A state judge expressed alarm last week at the estimated 200 million gallons of contaminated water seeping annually from leaky ash-storage ponds at the Coltstrip power plant and allowed a lawsuit challenging the state’s enforcement efforts to proceed.
The New Hampshire Electric Cooperative is the first buyer of power produced by the Antrim Wind project. The cooperative will purchase 25% of the $65 million project’s output, or about 7.2 MW.
Regulators approved the first rate increases in four years for Rochester Gas & Electric and New York State Electric and Gas customers. The increases are effective July 1 and will be phased in over two years.
Two state legislators introduced a bill last week that would force PSEG-Long Island to separate electricity purchasing planning from system management to reduce what the lawmakers believe is a conflict of interest.
The Roanoke River Basin Association has filed another lawsuit against Duke Energy over its coal ash management, this one alleging that Duke’s Mayo power plant violated the federal Clean Water Act.
The Public Service Commission last week unanimously approved the contentious $250 million, 87-turbine Brady Wind Energy Center I. The NextEra Energy Resources project will provide 150 MW of power for Basin Electric Power Cooperative.
A Public Utilities Commission nominating committee pared down a list of nine candidates to four to fill a vacancy, and now the final selection will be made by Gov. John Kasich.
State regulators approved infrastructure improvement plans for FirstEnergy’s four Pennsylvania utilities, which will allow the utilities to recover the costs through customer charges effective July 1.
The State Corporation Commission questioned Dominion Virginia Power’s request for a $140 million proposal to bury its most vulnerable power lines to decrease outages.
