NYPSC Approves 5.2% Ginna Rate Surcharge

By William Opalka

The New York Public Service Commission on Thursday approved a temporary 5.2% rate surcharge on delivery charges for Rochester-area electric customers, while a final agreement to keep the R.E. Ginna nuclear plant operating is hammered out.

The commission approved the surcharge, effective Sept. 1, to prevent “rate shock” while the final price tag for a reliability support services agreement is negotiated between Rochester Gas & Electric and Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, the plant’s owner (14-E-0270).

The Rochester utility had sought the surcharge to avoid rate compression once the RSSA is approved. (See FERC Rejects Ginna Jurisdiction Challenge.)

Industrial customers, environmentalists and consumer advocates had opposed the surcharge, arguing that the need for an increase was hypothetical until the RSSA is finalized.

The PSC, which had ordered the agreement to keep the plant operating until transmission alternatives are built, rejected requests to wait until the final costs were determined.

“If the commission does nothing, the costs associated with the RSSA, if later approved, could build to … being more than a 20% increase,” said Doris Stout, director of accounting at the PSC.

PSC staff estimated the rate increase would be about 10.4% if collection was delayed until January. RG&E estimates that its deferred collection will reach approximately $39.3 million from the effective date of the RSSA through the end of this month and will continue to grow, with interest.

RG&E has a balance of about $155 million in rate credits, which opponents of the rate surcharge want to use. Stout said using too many of these credits would adversely affect RG&E’s credit. PSC staff recommended, and the commission approved, that customer credits would be used to make up the difference between the amount collected from the surcharge and the cost of the RSSA.

The 5.2% rate was chosen in part because it matches estimates of the first-year revenue requirement for the Ginna Retirement Transmission Alternative, a project that would eliminate transmission constraints preventing the delivery of more generation into the Rochester area. PSC staff estimate the project will cost almost $140 million, with an in-service date of May 2017.

“I think what the staff has proposed here today is an elegant solution to a difficult problem,” Commission Chair Audrey Zibelman said at the meeting, citing the need to avoid rate compression while preserving the RG&E’s financial stability.

“I thought it made a huge amount of sense to say let’s set the level of the surcharge at the expected level of the transmission replacement because that’s a cost we know will be a long-term cost for the company to incur,” she added later.

Stout noted that requests for temporary rate increases are rare, saying the last she recalls was in 1996 for Niagara Mohawk.

“Although the scope and nature of RG&E’s ultimate liability to Ginna is uncertain, given that the RSSA may not be approved in its current form or at all, the reasonable costs of the reliability service obligation that was imposed upon Ginna in November ultimately must be recovered in some fashion,” the commission wrote. “An important element of just and reasonable rates is price stability and the avoidance of rate shock to consumers from sudden, significant increases.”

The agreement, set to be retroactive to April 1 once approved, would cost about $175 million a year and be effective through late 2018. Constellation said it wants to retire Ginna, which it says it lost more than $150 million between 2011 and 2013.

Ginna Negotiators File Extension

Negotiators for Exelon and RG&E have asked for a second extension as they try to hammer out an agreement to keep the plant operating.

“We will be seeking another short-term extension to allow for continued negotiations. Exelon remains committed to working with RG&E and a number of stakeholders to reach an agreement that will allow Ginna to continue providing safe, reliable energy to the region,” Exelon spokeswoman Maria Hudson said.

Under the terms of the RSSA, Exelon could have ended negotiations and closed the plant this month. The companies had asked on July 31 for an extension that expired Monday.

The companies reported ongoing good-faith negotiations for the RSSA to resolve rate issues before the PSC and FERC. (See FERC Rejects Ginna Rates, Orders Settlement Proceeding.)

Rehearing Sought on ‘Price Suppression’

Meanwhile, a New York power plant owner asked FERC on Wednesday to rehear its complaint that the Ginna agreement is suppressing capacity market prices (ER15-1047).

TC Ravenswood said FERC erred in ruling that the effects on capacity prices were outside its review of the RSSA. (See FERC Rejects Ginna Jurisdiction Challenge.)

The company said Federal Power Act Section 205 gives FERC jurisdiction over the “price-suppressive” effects of the RSSA and that the commission misunderstood the company’s reasoning.

“The commission should grant rehearing because its failure to consider whether the RSSA is just and reasonable in light of the effect it will have on the rates the NYISO pays to suppliers in NYISO’s capacity market is in violation of the commission’s statutory duty, in contradiction of prior commission orders and judicial precedent, and is arbitrary, capricious and not based on substantial evidence,” the petition states.

August 18, 2015

ISO-NE: Use New Curve in Reconfiguration Auctions

By William Opalka

ISO-NE and the New England Power Pool Participants Committee want to begin using the RTO’s system-wide sloped demand curve in their Annual Reconfiguration Auctions.

The organizations submitted proposed Tariff changes to FERC that would apply the curve — first used in the ninth Forward Capacity Auction earlier this year — to the ARAs beginning in June 2016 (ER15-2404).

Under the current rules, demand in ARAs is represented by the fixed value of the installed capacity requirement.

The proposed changes “simply incorporate the system-wide demand curve used in an initial Forward Capacity Auction into the Annual Reconfiguration Auctions so that demand will be represented consistently in both FCAs and ARAs,” the petition said.

“Such consistency in the demand model from auction to auction avoids predictable, structural price differences,” Matthew C. Brewster, lead analyst in ISO-NE’s market development department, wrote in accompanying testimony.

Demand in import- and export-constrained capacity zones will continue to be established by local sourcing requirements and maximum capacity limits, respectively, the RTO said.

The RTO will conduct three ARAs to allow for the exchange of capacity supply obligations prior to the 2018/19 capacity commitment period covered by FCA 9.

The changes would not affect how suppliers participate in reconfiguration auctions. But unlike current rules, in which clearing occurs only through matching of counterparty offers and bids, clearing would occur using the demand curve, even without a counterparty.

The changes received the unanimous support of the NEPOOL Participants Committee and near-unanimous support from the NEPOOL Markets Committee.

Power generators have opposed a system-wide sloped demand curve and advocate a zonal demand curve to reflect capacity constraints in parts of New England. (See ISO-NE, NEPOOL Oppose Demand Curve Change.)

August 18, 2015June 15, 2023

PJM TEAC Briefs

VALLEY FORGE, Pa. — PJM planners have selected 11 small market efficiency projects and narrowed the list of proposals for its biggest congestion problem to 12 candidates.

The 11 projects — all transmission owner upgrades — have a combined cost of $59.2 million, with a benefit-cost ratio of 15.6 and estimated 2019 congestion reductions totaling $50 million. The PJM Board of Managers is expected to consider planners’ recommendations of the projects at their meeting in October.

“These are all locational type projects … they’re cheap fixes basically,” PJM’s Tim Horger told the Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee on Thursday. Over 15 years, “you’re going to see hundreds of millions” in savings.

The 12 proposed fixes for the AP South/AEP-DOM constraints will undergo further analysis, including an initial cost review and sensitivity analyses for changes in load forecasts, fuel prices and interface ratings.

About 20 of the larger proposals passed the 1.25 benefit-cost threshold. The 12 finalists are those that continued to meet the 1.25 threshold using a base case incorporating the 11 small projects and also reduce congestion for combined 2019 and 2022 simulations with minimum production costs and load payment savings of $20 million.

They range in cost from $15.7 million to $300.7 million.

Vice President of Planning Steve Herling said it was possible — though unlikely — that the AP South/AEP-DOM fixes could displace one or more of the 11 smaller local projects. “We’ll pull one of [the smaller projects] out of there if we have to,” he said.

Sharon Segner of LS Power questioned PJM’s method of winnowing the list, saying the RTO’s Tariff requires such projects be based only on the zone seeing reduced load payments.

“When you have multiple projects that all pass, the Tariff doesn’t tell us how to decide [among them],” Herling responded. “We’re having to use our judgment.”

Segner said PJM had told stakeholders that selections would be made based on the highest cost-benefit ratios. “That’s what motivates the market,” she said. “Otherwise it becomes pretty subjective and loosey-goosey.”

In total, PJM received 93 market efficiency proposals, including 35 transmission owner upgrades ranging from $100,000 to $68 million and 58 greenfield projects with costs of $9.2 million to $432.5 million.

Second Proposal Window Opens

PJM opened a second transmission proposal window Aug. 5, seeking solutions to 2020 transmission owner criteria violations and reliability problems identified from planners’ light load analysis. The RTO will accept proposals through Sept. 4.

No Projects Arise from ARR Review

The annual review of auction revenue rights feasibility resulted in no transmission upgrade projects, planners said. Already-approved upgrades were identified for violations on most of the 45 paths analyzed over the 10-year horizon. Three paths in the ATSI zone that saw violations in years nine and 10 will be monitored for potential upgrades in the future.

PJM: Despite Lack of Cost Allocation Rules, MISO Project Too Good to Ignore

PJM doesn’t know how it would allocate costs from its share of a potential transmission upgrade MISO is considering in southern Indiana, but the project’s potential to fix longstanding stability problems at American Electric Power’s Rockport substation is too compelling to ignore, planners said.

MISO officials said earlier this month that they are reevaluating the $67.2 million Duff-Coleman 345-kV project after learning of PJM’s interest in an alternative — a $76.3 million 345-kV Rockport-Coleman line — that could also fix the Rockport substation. (See MISO Plan to Revisit Runner-Up Tx Project Rekindles Stakeholder Angst.)

“The challenge is this is a market efficiency project in MISO and a reliability project in PJM” — a combination for which there are no cost allocation rules in the PJM-MISO joint operating agreement, Herling said. “This is just such a good opportunity we don’t want to let it go by.”

The area has added thousands of megawatts of generation but no new transmission since 1989. As a result, the Rockport substation has operated under a special protection scheme involving relays, and tripping and ramping down of generators. About 4,400 MW of generation was tripped in a 2007 incident.

PJM will have to move quickly; MISO planners intend to recommend the winning project to the MISO Board of Directors in December.

Initial results of PJM’s analysis are expected in time for MISO’s Aug. 19 Planning Advisory Committee meeting.

“It could be a win-win,” said PJM’s Chuck Liebold.

Planners Reevaluating Pratts Project

PJM is reconsidering its selection of the Gordonsville-Pratts-Remington transmission upgrade after learning that it will require 15 to 18 miles of new right of way, far more than initially believed.

In February, planners recommended the proposal from Dominion Resources and FirstEnergy at an estimated cost of $129 million to $164 million.

“We want to double check to make sure we’re doing the right project,” said General Manager of System Planning Paul McGlynn, who said planners will evaluate a Gordonsville-Remington route among the alternatives.

The Virginia State Corporation Commission, which would have to approve the project, says that existing rights of way should be given priority as the locations for transmission additions.

A representative for Madison County, Va., urged PJM to reject the original plan. He said the scale of the project is out of proportion to the rural county — population 13,000 — which is dependent solely on farming and tourism and has no public water or sewers. “That’s the question — the need versus what’s being proposed,” he said.

McGlynn noted, however, that the project is not being driven solely by load in the Pratts area.

PJM solicited solutions in its second Order 1000 proposal window last year.

Four developers suggested 16 proposals, including two transmission owner upgrades and 14 greenfield projects. Only six of the proposals were judged to have solved the violations. Two losing bidders, ITC Holdings and LS Power’s Northeast Transmission Development, have challenged the choice in letters to the PJM board. (See Tx Developers Challenge PJM Choice on Pratts Project.)

Planners will reevaluate the options in September and make a recommendation to the board in October.

— Rich Heidorn Jr.

August 18, 2015June 15, 2023

High Temps, Population Growth Push ERCOT to Demand Records

By Tom Kleckner

It had been four years since ERCOT last set a new demand record, but the Texas grid has been making up for lost time since August began. In the last two weeks, ERCOT has set three new hourly peaks, topping 69,000 MW in demand for the first time ever on Aug. 10.

ERCOT says while the summer temperatures are partly attributable to the increase, the state’s explosive population growth is the real driver.

“A large part of the demand we’re seeing is customer growth over the last few years,” said ERCOT COO Brad Jones last week.

Jones made his comments a few hours after ERCOT issued a conservation alert and asked customers to limit electricity usage during the 3-7 p.m. peak-demand hours Aug. 13. Triple-digit temperatures and outages at several power plants brought the ERCOT system perilously close to its 2,500-MW reserve threshold.

The system set a new all-time peak hourly demand Aug. 10 when it eclipsed the 69,000-MW mark for three consecutive hours, hitting a record 69,783 MW between 4 and 5 p.m. Operating reserves remained above 3,000 MW during the day, Jones said.

ERCOT previously set demand records Aug. 6 (68,912 MW) and Aug. 5 (68,459 MW). Until then, the ISO’s previous record was 68,305 MW, set Aug. 3, 2011.

At this pace, ERCOT will surpass August 2011’s record production of 38.2 GW of energy.

Jones said ERCOT imported power through its two links with SPP but avoided calling for load curtailments or other emergency operations thanks to conservation by consumers. Market prices jumped to about $1,700/MWh during the day.

Population Growth

The U.S. Census Bureau says Texas’ population has grown by 1.8 million people from 2010 to 2014, a 7.2% increase. The state’s population — almost 27 million at the end of 2014 — is expected to double by 2050.

According to the state comptroller, more than 100,000 single-family building permits and 64,000 multi-family permits have been issued in the 12 months ending June 2015.

The comptroller also said Texas’ real gross domestic product grew by 5.2% in 2014, compared with 2.39% for the U.S. The state’s unemployment rate was 4.2% in June, down from 5.0% in June 2014; it has been at or below the national average for 102 consecutive months.

Jones noted ERCOT serves some of the fastest-growing cities in the country. Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin and Fort Worth are among the 16 most populous cities in the U.S.

Some 4,800 MW of new generation will be coming online in the next three to four years, Jones said.

ERCOT said it will continue to monitor conditions as summer demand continues and call for conservation when needed. It has asked Texans to raise thermostats 2 to 3 degrees during peak hours, use fans, limit the use of large appliances to off-peak hours and close blinds and drapes during the afternoon.

“Voluntary conservation can help us reduce the potential for additional measures, such as rotating outages, to ensure reliability throughout the ERCOT grid,” said ERCOT’s Director of System Operations, Dan Woodfin, in one of many press releases the ISO has issued this month.

SPP: Hot, but not Breaking Records

The SPP footprint has seen some of the same triple-digit figures as Texas, but the RTO has not topped its record demand peak of 54,949 MW, set Aug. 3, 2011. Its high for the year came in July, when the SPP Balancing Authority recorded a peak of 45,873 MW.

August 18, 2015June 15, 2023

SPP Taps Ex-FBI Agent as Security Chief

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — SPP announced Monday it has appointed former FBI agent Mark Bowling as its director of compliance and security. Bowling will oversee SPP’s compliance policies and procedures, including national and regional reliability standards and tariff provisions, and he will be responsible for corporate security monitoring and response.

Bowling, who served as an FBI special agent for 20 years, also worked for the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General. He has investigative experience in computer intrusion, computer fraud, counter-terrorism, national security and counterintelligence. Prior to joining the FBI in 1995, Bowling was a naval nuclear engineering officer with the United States Navy for six years.

Michael Desselle, SPP’s vice president of process integrity and chief compliance and administrative officer, said Bowling’s “expertise in identifying and mitigating cyber threats will be extremely beneficial in leading the effort to protect our critical infrastructure assets.”

— Tom Kleckner

August 18, 2015June 15, 2023

Failed Lightning Arrester Caused April Outage

By Rich Heidorn Jr.

The power outage that darkened the White House and much of D.C. on April 7 began with the failure of a 230-kV lightning arrester in the Pepco portion of the Ryceville, Md., substation 40 miles south of the district, according to a briefing by the North American Electric Reliability Corp. last week.

The outage, which caused a “severe, prolonged voltage sag” in the D.C. area, began about 12:39 p.m. when Pepco’s protection systems failed to isolate a fault on the 230-kV line.

Two separate and redundant protection systems failed, the first as a result of a loose connection to an auxiliary trip relay circuit, the second due to “intermittent discontinuity” in an auxiliary trip relay circuit, according to a presentation to NERC’s Member Representatives Committee.

Pepco and Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative lost 532 MW of load for as long as two hours. Some customers automatically switched to back-up power sources, while customer protection systems separated others from the grid due to low voltage. The outage affected the Maryland peninsula bounded by the Potomac River on the west and the Chesapeake Bay on the east.

Panda Power’s Brandywine 202-MW combined-cycle plant and the Calvert Cliffs nuclear units 1 and 2 (1,779 MW) tripped offline. Brandywine returned to service after about an hour; Calvert Cliffs returned two days later.

Investigators found damage to an A-frame structure at the Ryceville substation, including pitting near burned arresters and a downed static wire. An A-phase conductor was found detached outside the fence line.

There was no evidence of burning to the A-phase arrester, suggesting that mechanical failure resulted from the arc burning off the insulator and the weight of the line breaking the arrester free from the structure.

August 18, 2015June 15, 2023

Talen Posts Profit in First Earnings Report

By Michael Brooks

Talen Energy released its first earnings report as an independent company last week, reporting net income of $26 million ($0.26/share) for the second quarter of 2015.

That’s based mostly on “legacy” data from the company’s plants, which were owned by PPL and Riverstone Holdings before Talen’s formation on June 1. Collectively, these plants’ profits doubled from $13 million ($0.13/share) in the second quarter of 2014. The company’s operating revenue stayed consistent for both periods, at $1.07 billion.

“Strong operational performance from our nuclear and gas generation assets led to improved financial results in the quarter,” CEO Paul Farr said in a statement.

During a conference call with investors, Farr said the Susquehanna nuclear plant performed well in spite of Unit 2’s cracked turbine blades, which have now been repaired. Talen will replace the blades for both Units 1 and 2 during the plant’s next scheduled fuel outage.

Farr also said that Talen will announce by the fourth quarter what assets it will be divesting to meet FERC’s conditions for approval of the company’s creation.

Despite the company’s optimism, Talen’s stock price remains low, closing at $15.95 last week. That’s well below the $20/share when the company went public.

“We do not believe our current share price reflects the underlying value of our business, and capital discipline will remain our top priority,” Farr told investors.

Upcoming Transactions

Talen reported adjusted EBITDA of $171 million for the quarter, a 35% increase over the same period last year.

Talen predicts EBITDA of $990 million for 2016 based on two deals expected to close by the end of the year.

One is the acquisition of three plants from MACH Gen that will see the company enter the NYISO market. (See Talen Entering NYISO in $1.2B Deal.)

The other is the sale of its renewable energy business to California-based Energy Power Partners. The deal was announced in June, and Talen filed for FERC approval earlier this month (EC15-182).

The $116 million sale ($1,785/kW) includes 25 wind, solar and biofuel facilities totaling 65 MW in PJM and ISO-NE.

August 18, 2015

NYPSC OKs 7 REV Demos, Rejects 5

The New York Public Service Commission staff has accepted seven proposed demonstration projects for the Reforming the Energy Vision initiative while asking for more refinements on four others.

The projects, filed July 1, are a component of the state’s REV program for utility-sponsored projects that offer collaboration with third parties. (See REV Proposals Seek to Increase Conservation.)

In letters to the state’s utilities, PSC staff said seven demonstration projects met criteria set out in the REV order. Staff said it would meet with sponsors of the remaining projects to discuss additional information needed to complete its review:

Three proposals by National Grid: a smart grid project in Clifton Park to give customers fixed-rate options based on energy consumption, its Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus engagement platform and its microgrid partnership with Clarkson University and the State University of New York at Potsdam;
Consolidated Edison’s CONnectED Home Platform that would connect homeowners with efficiency programs; and
Iberdrola’s proposed Energy Marketplace e-commerce website.

— William Opalka

August 18, 2015

SPP, MISO, PJM States Join Opposition to Clean Power Plan

By Tom Kleckner

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — While SPP says it is continuing to analyze the 1,500 pages in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, some stakeholders in the RTO’s 14-state footprint wasted no time taking action.

In the first of several expected legal challenges, state attorneys general from half of SPP’s states and six of MISO’s were among 15 who last week asked a federal court in D.C. to block the rules. Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wyoming joined West Virginia in filing a petition seeking a stay of the plan pending the outcome of expected legal challenges.

Also joining the petition were Wisconsin (MISO), Ohio (PJM) and Indiana and Kentucky (MISO and PJM). Alabama and Florida, outside of any organized markets, also joined.

But even as elected officials’ rhetoric remains hot, there were signs that the behind-the-scenes work toward compliance has already begun.

Opposition from Okla., Ark.

Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, who had filed an unsuccessful legal challenge even before the final rule was issued, continues to argue that the EPA rule is unlawful. EPA’s rules “[force] Oklahoma into fundamentally restructuring the generation, transmission, and regulation of electricity in such a manner that would threaten the reliability and affordability of power in the state,” he said.

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson also came out guns blazing. “It is clear that the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan could still result in significant electric rate increases for middle class ratepayers while having a minimal impact on global temperatures,” he said. “My administration will do everything it can to protect ratepayers.”

Hutchinson has directed the leadership of the state’s Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) and Public Service Commission “to discuss the details of the rule and the stakeholder process.”

In a press conference Monday, ADEQ Director Becky Keogh and Ted Thomas, chairman of the Public Service Commission, said they have been told to seek the lowest-cost option and will explore strategies that meet the Clean Power Plan while planning for the state’s future and allowing for growth.

Arkansas would need to reduce its emissions by 36.5% from its 2012 levels to meet the rule. Keogh said the state would begin gathering stakeholder input in early October as it decides whether to submit a plan to EPA by the September 2016 deadline or ask for a two-year extension.

“We have a lot more time,” Thomas said, “which is important when you’re making decisions that affect the citizens of the state.”

But Keogh said that while Arkansas has joined litigation against the Clean Power Plan, ADEQ and the PSC will still need to work quickly.

“We feel it’s prudent for the state to begin a deliberative process to evaluate our options and the potential impacts of those options,” she said. “Should the rule become final — and the deadline will be upon us very soon — it’s too important to wait for a final rule and then determine a path forward.”

SPP Analyses

SPP has taken a broader approach when analyzing the Clean Power Plan and its impact on the footprint’s reliability and economics. In an emailed statement, Lanny Nickell, the RTO’s vice president of engineering, noted SPP’s highest priority is maintaining the Bulk Electric System’s reliability in the central U.S.

“Compliance with the Clean Power Plan is best facilitated through SPP’s regional transmission planning process and energy market administration,” Nickell said. “Transmission planning requires analysis of many variables and takes considerable time.”

SPP’s planning process currently operates on near-term and 10- and 20-year cycles. Several stakeholder-driven initiatives are evaluating how to improve the planning process and best take into account Clean Power Plan impacts.

“I imagine there will be modeling based on the new rule,” Thomas said. “We don’t know yet what that’s going to be, but SPP, MISO and other groups we work with have extensive access to modeling, where you can put in price impacts and see the result.”

SPP has issued three reports on the Clean Power Plan since last October.

The first, a transmission-system impact evaluation, warned of rolling blackouts or cascading outages “unless the proposed CPP is modified significantly.” SPP said the original 2020 date for interim goals was unworkable and did not allow enough time to build the needed generation and transmission to accommodate coal plant retirements and deliver wind energy to population centers. (See MISO, SPP: EPA Clean Power Plan Threatens Reliability, Needs Longer Compliance Schedule.)

In April, SPP released a second analysis that indicated a regional-compliance approach with the 2030 deadline would cost an estimated $2.9 billion per year in capital investment and energy production costs. (See SPP: $45/ton Adder, Wind, Gas Meets EPA Carbon Rule.)

SPP issued a third study last month that concluded a state-by-state compliance approach would be a 40% increase over the regional plan. The latest assessment analyzed the EPA rule’s impact on existing generation and resource-expansion plans, without including the cost of new transmission needed to maintain reliability, gas-infrastructure expansion, market-design changes or transmission congestion. (See SPP: State-by-State Compliance Would Hike Carbon Reduction Costs by 40%.)

August 18, 2015

PJM Market Implementation Committee Briefs

VALLEY FORGE, Pa. — The Market Implementation Committee last week approved rule changes that will help the Illinois Municipal Electric Agency to meet its capacity requirements with historic resources.

IMEA is among the load-serving entities that procured capacity resources outside of their locational deliverability areas to serve a portion of their load.

PJM’s Reliability Pricing Model capacity construct, which launched after IMEA obtained its external capacity, does not provide a way to allocate and maintain the benefits of historical resource and transmission service agreements — an issue that can increase an LSE’s costs if its LDA becomes modeled separately and binds in an auction.

The Independent Market Monitor had expressed concern that PJM’s initial proposed solution was overly broad. But it agreed with the revised solution, which covered only LSEs subject to fixed resource requirements (FRR).

FRR entities such as IMEA are subject to a percentage internal resource requirement (PIRR) if their zone is modeled separately, voiding the use of their historic capacity resources.

The solution approved by members makes three rule changes:

The PIRR is enforced only if the LDA has been separately modeled due to certain triggers;
An FRR Entity would be permitted to terminate its FRR alternative election prior to meeting the minimum five-year commitment period requirement under certain conditions; and
First-time elections of the FRR alternative would be due four months prior to a Base Residual Auction instead of the current two-month deadline.

PJM Asked to Consider Masking FTR Ownership

PJM would consider masking ownership of financial transmission rights under a problem statement presented by DC Energy’s Bruce Bleiweis at the MIC last week.

Currently, all RTOs publish the identities of FTR holders when posting auction results. By contrast, in all other market transactions, such as capacity auctions and daily energy auctions, PJM does not disclose the ownership, Bleiweis said.

“I think the inequity is transparent to everyone here,” Bleiweis said. “We don’t see any reason FTRs should be treated differently” than any other power product.

FERC initially allowed the current transparency to spur a secondary FTR market. Now that this market is established, this disclosure is no longer necessary, Bleiweis argued. He said that knowing another company’s position could lead to unfair competitive advantages.

There was some confusion as to what exactly is disclosed in other products, however. Carl Johnson of the PJM Public Power Coalition said he thought PJM published capacity positions of companies once the delivery year began.

PJM’s Tom Zadlo answered that only a list of cleared units is posted. Bleiweis said that if the problem statement is approved at next month’s MIC meeting, he would work with PJM to generate a simple list showing exactly what is posted for each product.

Marji Philips of Direct Energy said she “remains very concerned” by the proposal. In the past, she said, market participants have identified “mischief” in the FTR markets that the Independent Market Monitor and PJM did not catch, based on the increased transparency.

Bleiweis said PJM’s effort would be consistent with ISO-NE, which approved a move to aggregate FTR ownership at its November 2014 Markets Committee meeting.

— Michael Brooks and Rich Heidorn Jr.