By Rory D. Sweeney
Stakeholders continue to react coolly to PJM’s proposed rules for generator fuel-cost policies, spending two and a half hours expressing their concerns at last week’s Market Implementation Committee meeting.
PJM has held three meetings in the past three weeks to explain the policy to stakeholders, several of whom said last week that the rules are more punitive than incentivizing. The RTO is due to make an interim compliance filing on the issue Aug. 16.
The rules have been revised so that sellers without approved fuel-cost policies are not required to submit cost-based offers. They can, however, submit negative price offers and are subject to the greater of their capacity resource’s deficiency charges or nonperformance charges — such as those from a performance hour assessment.
A seller would have 30 days to revise a rejected policy, during which time the seller would revert back to using a previously approved policy.
A seller deemed by PJM and the Independent Market Monitor to have violated its approved policy would be subject to a separate penalty. The amount would be calculated via a formula based on the unit’s capacity and the LMP at its bus. The penalties would begin five days after the seller is notified about the noncompliance.
The proposal has “significant problems and needs substantial rethinking,” said Monitor Joe Bowring, who distributed his own proposal that requires CP units that don’t have approved policies to make offers, but penalizes them in a way similar to the unit capacity/LMP formula.
“It sounds like one bad rule offset by another bad rule,” Bowring said of PJM’s proposal. “They all have unintended consequences. What that means is that the units aren’t going to offer in, which isn’t what you want. You want units to offer in.”
“Unless we’re just trying to find another way to penalize a generator, can we please rethink this?” asked Jason Cox of Dynegy. Instead, the lost opportunity created by holding sellers to a $0 offer “seems like a pretty efficient way to get them to get a policy done,” he said.
Stakeholders felt the policy lacked clarity. Bob O’Connell of Main Line Electricity Market Consultants said that it has no way to maintain compliance, no procedure for making necessary revisions while maintaining compliance and no timeline for that process.
Ed Tatum of American Municipal Power said stakeholders have expressed “grave concerns” that “this penalty is overly punitive, goes beyond the scope of the order and is generally bad market design.”
Under the proposal, if the Monitor disagreed with a PJM-approved policy, it could refer it to FERC’s Office of Enforcement.
That, said Tatum, is “unacceptable.”
The purpose of the policy is twofold, Bowring explained: to ensure compliance with all requirements to participate in the PJM market and that offers are consistent with competitive offers. Sellers need to document a verifiable and systematic method for calculating cost-based offers, he said.
“There has to be recognition that we’re changing the paradigm about fuel-cost policies; it makes sense to give everyone enough time to get there, but there have to be incentives to get there so people are not simply wasting time [and] everyone’s working toward that same objective,” he said.
Stakeholders questioned how the policies would be reviewed and whether the process or the result was the real focus.
“I’m just hopeful that in the final language, that we’re talking about the reasonableness of the process, not the reasonableness of the result and that that’s really clearly articulated to everybody,” said Mike Borgatti of Gabel Associates.
The proposal is scheduled to be brought to votes by the MIC, along with the Markets and Reliability and Members committees next month, with board approval targeted for October before a filing with FERC.





The amount of electricity generated by natural gas in July eclipsed its own record, set in July of last year, according to the Energy Information Administration. The trend, caused in part by coal plant retirements and a boost in temperatures, spurred the agency to predict natural gas and coal will be used to generate 34% and 30%, respectively, of the nation’s electricity in 2016. This compares with slightly less than 33% for natural gas, and a bit more than 33% for coal, last year.
A federal jury last week convicted Pacific Gas & Electric on six charges of violating gas pipeline safety laws and obstructing the federal investigation into the 2010 pipeline explosion that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes in San Bruno, Calif.
Intrepid Potash has relinquished a mineral rights lease in eastern New Mexico, clearing the way for construction of an interim storage facility for spent nuclear fuel by a partnership between Holtec International and the Eddy Lea Energy Alliance.


In response to a 2011 challenge by President Obama, the Army has entered into 127 energy-saving projects with the private sector worth more than $1 billion.
A Government Accountability Office audit released last week revealed that the Department of Energy knew it had only a 1% chance of meeting a March 2016 deadline to clean up and safely reopen the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant nuclear-waste facility near Carlsbad, N.M. A truck fire and a leaking drum of radioactive waste shut down the nation’s only underground nuclear waste facility in February 2014.
The Department of the Interior announced Friday that it would be opening 144,000 acres off the coast of North Carolina to leases for offshore wind projects. The site, to be called the Kitty Hawk Wind Energy Area, starts about 24 miles offshore and extends another 26 miles to the southeast.




EFH is set to begin its latest attempt to exit bankruptcy this month after the deal at the center of a prior plan fell apart after it had been confirmed by Bankruptcy Court Judge Christopher S. Sontchi.
The controversial, multi-billion-dollar Kemper Power Plant, which began making synthetic gas from coal July 14, will take an additional month to finish and cost an extra $43 million, Mississippi Power Co. announced last week.
Black Hills Energy started construction on a $54 million, 147-mile transmission line running from eastern Wyoming to western South Dakota. Planning for the project took 10 years, and construction crews started cleaning land on the route last week.
Chesapeake Energy Corp. said it has agreed to hand over its Barnett Shale holdings to a private-equity-backed operator. The move allows Chesapeake to avoid almost $2 billion in pipeline contracts.
Duke Energy will issue three series of unsecured bonds, totaling $3.75 billion, to help finance its $4.9 billion purchase of Piedmont Natural Gas. The first series, with an interest rate of 1.8%, will be due in 2021; the second series, at 2.65%, will be due in 10 years. A third series, carrying the highest interest rate of 3.75%, will be due in 30 years.
A chemical fire broke out during the decommissioning of three units at the Four Corners Power Plant in northwestern New Mexico Aug. 11, forcing the plant’s evacuation. The fire was reported at 10:54 a.m. and was extinguished shortly after 1 p.m.