FTR Holders Seek Shortfall Fix

Financial Transmission Rights holders asked PJM and Market Monitor Joe Bowring last week to take action to address the continuing shortfall in FTR funding. They received sympathy but no commitments.

In June, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rejected a complaint (EL13-47) by FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. that sought to bill all transmission users to make up the shortfalls. While PJM largely supported FirstEnergy’s proposed solution, the Monitor rejected it as “simplistic” and unfair to load.

The commission urged PJM and its stakeholders to reach a consensus solution and to work with its neighbors to reduce congestion on the RTO’s borders. In August, the commission granted rehearing in the case, keeping the docket open but offering no timetable for further action.

$1.1 Billion

In the interim, market participants say, the problem has only gotten worse. Cumulative shortfalls have grown to more than $1.1 billion (see chart). DC Energy’s Bruce Bleiweis told the Members Committee Thursday that March “could be the worst ever.”

“It’s a problem that hasn’t gone away,” said Bleiweis. “We’re still looking for action.”

PJM introduced FTRs in 1999, intending them to provide a financial hedge against the costs of day-ahead transmission congestion.

The value of an FTR is based upon the difference between the day-ahead congestion price between a specific source and sink. The quantity of FTRs to be auctioned is supposed to be limited by transmission capacity.

But a PJM stakeholder report found that revenues were falling short because pre-auction modeling failed to capture some transmission outages and deratings. The modeling also could not account for market-to-market flowgates added in the middle of a planning period.

Consensus Elusive

Since the report, PJM officials have worked with MISO to reduce congestion resulting from cross-border flows.

Last spring, stakeholders also approved two modeling changes recommended by the Financial Transmission Rights Task Force that were expected to provide modest improvements. But members were unable to reach consensus on others, including several proposed by the Monitor. (See MIC Rejects Change to FTR Long-Term Auction Modeling.) The task force was disbanded in December.

With no solutions coming from the stakeholder process and no action from FERC, Goldman Sachs’ J. Aron & Co. seized upon PJM’s ad hoc creation of a pricing interface in the ATSI region during the Sept. 10-11 heat wave. PJM’s action, intended to make demand response set prices in the area, exacerbated underfunding by $23 million over the two days, J. Aron said in a filing in the FirstEnergy docket in December.

Top Binding Constraints in FTR Auctions and ARR Allocations (Source: State of the Market 2013, fig. 13-1)

FTR holders found a new opportunity to bring the issue up when Bowring gave members a presentation on the 2013 State of the Market report, which also criticized the creation of such interfaces.

Harry Singh, of Goldman Sachs, said market participants used to be able to buy 1.2 or 1.3 FTRs for a path they were looking to hedge, but that the technique no longer works because the level of underfunding varies significantly from day to day. On Feb. 14, for example, the funding was only 30%; on Sept. 10 and 11 it approached zero.

In 2010, load serving entities converted almost 63% of their Auction Revenue Rights (ARRs) to FTRs, Singh said. In 2013, only 31% did so. “That tells you people think it doesn’t work as a hedge,” Singh said. Instead, he said, the market has become a way to speculate on uplift and the level of underfunding.

Sympathy, No Commitments

Bowring and PJM CEO Terry Boston acknowledged the problem but were noncommittal about pursuing solutions.

“I’m almost certain the stakeholder process is not going to come to a resolution on this issue,” Boston said. “But we need to keep it on the table.”

The State of the Market report declared the FTR market performance competitive. But it said the market design was flawed because it “incorporates widespread cross subsidies which are not consistent with an efficient market design and over sells FTRs.”

The Monitor noted that the market has responded to the shortfalls by reducing bid prices and increasing bid volumes.

Clearing prices for FTR obligations averaged $0.30/MW in planning year 2013/14, down from $0.71/MW in 2010-11. FTR obligation sell offers dropped to $0.05/MW down from $0.22/MW over the same period.

The report reiterates eight recommendations Bowring made in an April 2013 filing in response to the FirstEnergy complaint.

Bowring said the eight recommendations could increase the FTR payout ratio to almost 96% from the current rate in the mid-70s. The recommendations included a reduction in the allocation of ARRs, the elimination of portfolio “netting” and using probabilistic analysis to improve transmission outage modeling.

In response to a question from Bleiweis, Bowring said he had considered making a Section 206 filing to win FERC approval for his proposed changes. “It’s really a question of timing,” Bowring said, adding that he’d like “to see if others will join us” in support.

April 1, 2014

Missing Zero Produces Illusory Locational Marginal Prices

PJM’s day-ahead prices for last Thursday turned out to be far more modest than they initially appeared.

The RTO reposted the day-ahead results for March 27 after officials identified an error in the input data used to clear the market. A value of 350 MW was used for the West Interface instead of 3,500 MW for hours 8 through 23, causing incorrect prices and quantities in the day-ahead market solution.

A glum Stu Bresler, vice president of market operations, informed stakeholders of the error at the end of Thursday’s Members Committee meeting. In reposting the results, Bresler said PJM was invoking a provision put in the Tariff “with the hope that we’d never have to use it.”

The changes reduced prices by as much as $37/MWh, with the biggest changes seen in the AECO, BGE, JCPL, METED, PECO, PPL and PSEG zones. In the PPL zone, for example, the LMP for hour 20 — originally posted at $89.41 — was reduced to $52.16.

Bresler said yesterday that the error resulted in higher day-ahead dispatch orders for some generators east of the West Interface and lower orders for those to the west, but that the actual dispatch of the units in real time was unaffected.

Bresler said the apparent constraint at the West Interface “didn’t bind that hard, so it wasn’t enough to raise a red flag” before the day-ahead results were initially posted.

He said officials are investigating whether they can add an automated check to prevent such errors in the future. “We certainly don’t want the market to think this is going to be a regular occurrence,” he said.

March 25, 2014

Hearing Set After Talks Collapse over Duke Transition Costs

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has scheduled a hearing over how much Duke Energy will pay to resolve its obligations for transmission expansion projects in MISO after settlement talks collapsed.

Administrative Law Judge Philip C. Baten ordered a prehearing conference for April 1, in preparation for a scheduled Oct. 21 hearing in the case (ER12-91), which resulted from the move by Duke Energy’s Ohio and Kentucky utilities from MISO to PJM in May 2010.

In September, FERC rejected a settlement by Duke’s affiliates, ruling that the agreement unfairly imposed transition costs on transmission customers who were not party to the agreement. (See FERC Rejects Settlements over ATSI, Duke Moves to PJM.)

Baten ordered the case to hearing after the parties indicated at a settlement conference March 10 that they were at an impasse.

March 25, 2014

FERC Criticism of Ex-Chair Mounts

By Kathy Larsen and Rich Heidorn Jr.

WASHINGTON — Tony Clark, the junior member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, rarely says much at the commission’s monthly meetings. On Thursday, however, he became the latest of his colleagues to criticize former Chairman Jon Wellinghoff’s crusade to bring attention to physical threats to the grid.

Clark made a pointed reference to Wellinghoff in praising acting Chair Cheryl LaFleur for leading the commission to issue a rule March 7 directing the North American Electric Reliability Corp. to develop measures to protect the grid from physical threats.

The order was prompted by concerns raised by the April 2013 attack on Pacific Gas and Electric’s Metcalf substation.

“As all of you who work with FERC know, the chairman at any given time shoulders the responsibility of directing the drafting of orders and deciding what will be circulated to his or her colleagues for approval,” Clark said in a prepared statement. “In all honesty, something along these lines could have and perhaps should have been done months, if not several years ago …”

Wellinghoff, who was chairman from 2009 until December, has been widely quoted in news accounts since leaving the commission in a campaign to raise awareness of the threat of sabotage. He has called the Metcalf attack “the most significant incident of domestic terrorism involving the grid” to date.

Wellinghoff, now a partner at law firm Stoel Rives LLP in San Francisco, did not respond to a request for comment last week.

Norris, Moeller Criticism

At the commission’s February meeting, Commissioners John Norris and Philip Moeller warned that Wellinghoff’s public statements, which were featured in articles in The Wall Street Journal and several California newspapers in February, could result in copycat attacks. Norris also warned against overreacting to the threats, saying it could lead to wasteful spending. (See FERC, NERC: Don’t Overreact to Sabotage Threat.)

LaFleur did not criticize Wellinghoff’s actions but said she agreed with her colleagues that “the resilience of the grid needs to be viewed broadly.”

Critical Substations

The Journal’s Feb. 5 article also reported Wellinghoff saying that a FERC analysis found that “if a surprisingly small number of U.S. substations were knocked out at once, that could destabilize the system enough to cause a blackout that could encompass most of the U.S.”

On March 13, the Journal published a second article reporting details from a confidential FERC analysis — apparently the same one Wellinghoff had referred to in February — that concluded the country’s entire grid could be shut down for weeks or months if only nine substations were sabotaged.

The newspaper did not identify the locations of those substations or its source for the study.

The article said that FERC had conducted power flow analyses on the most critical 30 substations among 55,000 substations nationwide. It reportedly concluded that disabling just nine substations — four in the East, three in the West and two in Texas — could send the nation into darkness.

The Journal said it had reviewed a memo prepared by Leonard Tao, FERC’s director of external affairs, that summarized the study’s findings: “Destroy nine interconnection substations and a transformer manufacturer and the entire United States grid would be down for at least 18 months, probably longer,” said the memo.

Wellinghoff also commented for the March 13 article. “There are probably less than 100 critical high voltage substations on our grid in this country that need to be protected from a physical attack,” the Journal quoted Wellinghoff. “It is neither a monumental task, nor is it an inordinate sum of money that would be required to do so.”

Leak of Report Condemned

That article drew harsh condemnation. “Whoever is the source of this leak — and it appears to be someone with a great deal of access to highly sensitive, narrowly distributed FERC documents — is clearly putting our nation at risk,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), said in a statement. “If his or her actions are not illegal, they should be.”

LaFleur, in a statement the same day, acknowledged the newspaper had not identified the critical substations but condemned it for publishing “other sensitive information.”

There may be value in discussing steps to keep the grid safe, she said, but “the publication of sensitive material about the grid crosses the line from transparency to irresponsibility, and gives those who would do us harm a roadmap to achieve malicious designs.”

NERC issued a statement saying “Articles like the one in The Wall Street Journal today do nothing to improve security, rather they jeopardize it.”

Clark last week did not criticize the Journal but did “find fault with those people who may possess sensitive or confidential information, and then choose to release it.”

Costly Investments

At least two gunmen were believed to be involved in the attack on PG&E’s Metcalf 500/230 kV substation near San Jose. The shooting caused more than $15 million in damage, idling the substation for nearly a month, but no power interruptions. (See Substation Saboteurs ‘No Amateurs’.)

FERC told NERC March 7 to develop standards within 90 days that require transmission operators to conduct risk assessments to determine what facilities could have a critical impact on grid operations if damaged by saboteurs. The standards will also require operators to evaluate their vulnerabilities and implement security plans to protect the critical equipment. (See FERC Orders Rules on Grid’s Physical Security.)

VA State Police guarding a Dominion substation in Dinwiddie County (Source: WTVR-TV)

PG&E said last month it plans to install opaque walls, advanced camera systems, enhanced lighting and additional alarms at multiple substations as a result of the attack. Although it did not place a cost estimate on the improvements, it said it would likely seek a rate increase to fund them.

Dominion Resources Inc. said last month it plans to spend $300 million to $500 million over the next decade to increase security of its facilities. It would include two levels of perimeter security featuring “anti-climb” fences and key-card access systems for substation yards.

Earlier this month, a TV station in Richmond, Va., reported that state troopers had begun guarding two Dominion substations in Dinwiddie and Hanover counties. Dominion said there have been no threats to any of the company’s facilities.

March 25, 2014

Gas Drives News in FERC State of the Markets

Natural gas production and demand hit new records in 2013, and futures prices suggest the trend may continue this year, FERC staff said last week in their annual State of the Markets review.

Natural gas spot prices, which had fallen to record lows in 2012, rose across the U.S. last year, encouraging shale gas production and pushing wholesale power prices higher.

Most trading hubs saw gas prices increase 30 to 40%, with the biggest increases in the Northeast, where prices occasionally hit $20 to $30 per MMBtu.

Gas demand increased 2.3% in 2013 to a record 70 Bcfd. Residential and commercial demand was up 16%, largely due to colder than normal weather in the first quarter of the year. Industrial demand increased 1.8% due to growth from mining, manufacturing and petrochemicals.

Demand from electric generation dropped 10% as the rise in gas prices reduced the fuel’s competitiveness. As a result, coal saw a 5% increase in electric generation demand.

Gas prices would have risen further but for an increase in supply. Total U.S. supply, including production and imports, averaged 68 Bcfd, up 1.0%. Production from the Marcellus Shale rose 44%.

The increase in production helped push long-term natural gas futures prices lower, leading industry to continue its investments in gas-fueled manufacturing. More than 90 new gas-consuming industrial projects or expansions began operations in 2013 and almost 220 are expected in 2014.

Power Prices up Despite Drop in Demand

Despite a 0.1% decline in power demand nationally, electricity spot prices rose across the country.

The largest increases were in the Northeast, with higher natural gas costs driving prices at the Mass Hub up 54%, and in the West, where prices at Mid-Columbia rose 66% due to reduced hydroelectric production.

Financial trading volumes for natural gas fell on the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), while trading volumes for electricity rose.

Electric financial trading volumes on ICE rose 19%, with trades with durations of two months to one year up 44%.

FERC attributed the increase to the Dodd-Frank Act. In October 2012, ICE converted cleared energy swaps to futures to address Dodd-Frank regulations to increase transparency. As a result, many transactions previously conducted bilaterally have moved to exchanges, FERC said.

About 92% of the financial trading for electricity products outside ERCOT took place at RTOs, up from 90% in 2012. PJM trades continued to dominate, accounting for 68% of electricity trading on ICE, up from 63% a year earlier.

Natural gas saw declines in both financial and physical trading volumes, with ICE reporting a 14% decline in financial volumes and physical trading dropping 30%. FERC attributed the drop to “relatively stable” gas prices in 2013, which reduced traders’ profits.

March 25, 2014

NRG Doubles Down

By Ted Caddell

Does NRG Energy know something the rest of the electric industry doesn’t? Some on Wall Street seem to think so.

After a week in which it scooped up more than a half-million retail energy customers from Dominion Resources and won approval for its acquisition of bankrupt Edison Mission Energy, NRG shares hit a 52-week high Friday.

Already the nation’s largest independent power producer, NRG will vault past Southern Co. to become the second-largest generator overall with the addition of Edison Mission’s 8,000 MW.

The Edison Mission purchase will add 5,062 MW to NRG’s 13,445 MW generating portfolio in PJM, giving it about 10% of PJM’s installed capacity, ranking it third behind Exelon Corp. and PPL. It also added 2,421 MW in the California ISO, with smaller amounts in MISO, ERCOT and non-RTO regions.

The purchase of Dominion Resources’ retail electric business, announced March 11, will bring it more than 600,000 customers in Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, Connecticut, New York, Massachusetts and Texas. NRG already has 2 million retail electric customers throughout the country served by its retail providers Reliant, Green Mountain Energy, Energy Plus and NRG Residential Solutions.

NRG expects to close on the acquisition by the end of this month. Neither company has disclosed the value of the deal.

NRG’s acquisitiveness is a stark contrast to the strategies of other large generators such as Dominion, Duke Energy and First Energy, which have announced a shift away from competitive retail markets in favor of regulated operations.

NRG, which has been built from a series of acquisitions and owns no legacy utilities, doesn’t have the option of falling back on a rate base.

Still, at a time when other generators are talking about selling or shuttering assets because of low capacity and energy prices, NRG’s decision to double down is a notable counterargument.

Turning Point?

Are we seeing a turning point in the fortunes of competitive generators?

Yes, say analysts at Credit Suisse, who last Friday raised their rating on Exelon to “outperform” and boosted their price target to $35 from $23. “We believe expectations and fundamentals for competitive power have found a bottom, with the potential for a long awaited recovery to take form over the next 12 months,” the company said.

Exelon shares closed yesterday at $32.93, up $1.57 (5%) over Thursday’s close. (NRG shares closed yesterday at $30.36, pulling back slightly from the 52-week high of $30.93.)

Exelon, which owns the largest generation fleet in PJM, could see its market share shrink if it follows through with threats to close one or more nuclear plants. (See Exelon in Lobbying Push to Save Ill. Nukes.)

PJM energy prices rose 10% last year as natural gas prices jumped 40%. (See State of the Market: PJM Passes, with Provisos) PJM’s efforts to limit the volume of imports and demand response that clears in the capacity market could also boost generators’ fortunes.

But most analysts are still labeling Exelon a sell or hold. So NRG’s bullishness carries with it risks.

The Street.com, which rates NRG a “hold,” said the company’s strong revenue growth and cash flow is offset by weak profit margins and decreases in net income and return on equity.

Goldman Sachs upgraded NRG to “buy” from “neutral” on Thursday, saying the company’s cash flow gives it the flexibility to buy back stock and debt, as well as make additional acquisitions.

NRG History

NRG is well aware of the risks. Born as an unregulated subsidiary of Minneapolis-based Xcel Energy, it fell into bankruptcy in May 2003 after several years of aggressive growth as a result of falling power prices and a decrease in energy trading following the implosion of Enron.

It emerged from Chapter 11 in December 2003, headed by a new CEO David Crane, who remains in charge today.

In late 2005, NRG purchased Texas Genco, the former generation arm of Reliant Energy, from a group of private equity firms. In 2009, it rebuffed a takeover bid by Exelon shortly after acquiring Reliant’s retail operations.

It added renewable power retailer Green Mountain Energy to its portfolio in 2010.

In 2012, it added GenOn Energy, the offspring of Reliant spinoff RRI Energy and Atlanta-based Mirant Corp., and one of the largest independent power producers in the U.S.

Last August it expanded into demand response with the purchase of Energy Curtailment Specialists.

Retail-Generation Synergies

Julien Dumoulin-Smith, a utility analyst at UBS Securities LLC, said the Dominion purchase makes sense for NRG as a way to find a market for its generation.

“When you are thinking about the retail markets, the reality is, if you are a large player, you want to be backstopped by a large generation portfolio,” he said. In terms of retail energy, NRG “has wanted to expand from its core base in Texas to the Northeast for a while. This achieves that.”

NRG spokeswoman Melissa Hensley suggested that the acquisition was part of a long-term play by the company, which hopes to see more markets open to retail competition.

“This acquisition supports NRG’s strategy of growing its retail footprint,” she said in an interview Friday. “Additionally, NRG strongly believes in competitive markets. We want to ensure customers continue to be served through these markets, and we want to be an example for other markets that hope to open up to competition.”

Although Hensley wouldn’t say how many of those 600,000 new customers are in the PJM territory, she said about 80%, or 480,000, are in the Northeast, with the rest in Texas.

In contrast, Dominion has shifted its strategy to focus on regulated earnings. Since 2006, it has been selling off commodity-based operations, such as oil and gas exploration, and production and merchant generation, to concentrate on regulated businesses.

In January it announced its intent to exit the unregulated retail energy business, which had stalled in the last two years, with its customer count falling to 2.1 million, a 2% drop, since 2010.

It highlighted the challenges of the business in its 10-K filing for 2013, noting that it was competing against incumbent utilities with “the advantage of longstanding relationships with their customers and greater name recognition.”

Dominion will retain its nearly 2.4 million customers served by its regulated utility, Dominion Virginia Power.

Renewables

A bankruptcy judge in Chicago approved the sale of the Edison Mission assets to NRG for $2.6 billion. Edison Mission and subsidiary Midwest Generation filed for bankruptcy protection in December 2012, blaming low power prices, high fuel costs and expensive mandated coal plant retrofits. The deal is expected to close April 1.

The acquisition included 1,700 MW of wind, giving NRG more than 2,900 MW of wind and solar in operation or under construction.

That is one of the important points behind NRG’s acquisition, according to Dumoulin-Smith. “This plays into their desire to consolidate into the renewable sector,” he said. “This is something they really wanted to do.”

The Edison Mission generation assets are spread throughout the U.S., in California, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Texas, Iowa, New Mexico, Minnesota, Illinois, Wyoming, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Utah and Iowa.

PJM Impact

With the EME acquisition, NRG will have about 18,500 MW of generation in PJM, leapfrogging AEP, Dominion and FirstEnergy in the RTO rankings.

The Edison Mission acquisition will boost NRG’s “economic capacity” market share in PJM from 6.8% to 9.4% during the high demand periods in the summer, according to an analysis the company filed with FERC in seeking approval for the purchase.

In CAISO, its post-merger share will grow to 8.3% from 7.3% during the peak winter periods, according to the analysis.

In MISO — the only other FERC-jurisdictional market in which NRG and EME had overlapping assets — NRG’s market share will increase to about 3.1% of total capacity, from 2.9%.

Market Monitor Seeks Mitigation

PJM’s Market Monitor expressed concern that NRG generation near a transmission constraint on the MISO-PJM seam — the Lanesville 345/138 kV transformer — could exert market power. The Monitor also cited a potential increase in market power in the PJM regulation market.

The Monitor asked the commission to require NRG to make cost-based offers in the regulation market and to continue to offer the same units and quantities historically offered into the regulation and Lanesville energy market.

The commission rejected the Monitor’s request for mitigation, saying that transmission upgrades have eliminated Lanesville as a constraint.

Because the Monitor’s analysis found market power screen failures in the regulation market for only 189 hours of the year (2%), “and many of these hours are non-contiguous and are spread over many time periods, we find there are no competitive concerns,” the commission said.

March 25, 2014

FERC: Six Months to Move Gas, Electric Schedules

By Ted Caddell

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission set a six-month deadline for the natural gas and electric industries to better align their daily schedules, adding urgency to changes already proposed by RTO and pipeline representatives.

In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR), FERC said Thursday it wants to start the natural gas operating day earlier, move the Timely Nomination Cycle later and give natural gas shippers more times per day to react to rapid demand changes.

The FERC proposal (RM14-2) largely parallels a “strawman” proposal by the Natural Gas Council, except for the commission’s call to move the start of the gas day to 4 a.m. Central Time (CT) from the current 9 a.m. CT start. The Council, a group of natural gas suppliers and pipeline operators, rejected an earlier start time, saying it would cause safety and contractual problems.

FERC also issued two other orders aimed at addressing natural gas shortfalls in times of high demand.

“This past winter has highlighted the critical and growing interdependence of natural gas pipelines and electricity markets,” Acting Chairman Cheryl LaFleur said. “Today’s orders take steps to recognize and address that interdependence to optimize the use of our gas and electric networks for the benefit of all customers.”

In February, RTO Insider reported that the Natural Gas Council had tentatively agreed after meetings with officials of PJM and other RTOs to move their nominating schedules to later in the day. PJM officials said they would seek to move the RTO’s day-ahead schedule forward. (See Pipelines, PJM to Align Daily Schedules.)

The strawman proposal would:

Extend the Timely Nomination deadline to 1 p.m. CT (from the current 11:30 a.m.);
Provide two intraday cycles during the business day with firm bumping rights; and
Add a third, evening intraday cycle for early morning gas flow with no bumping rights.

Conflict over Gas Day Start

Current Gas Schedule vs. Natural Gas Council 'Strawman' (Source: Natural Gas Council) — Current Gas Schedule vs. Natural Gas Council ‘Strawman’ (Source: Natural Gas Council)

Unlike FERC’s proposal, however, the strawman proposal by the Gas Council would retain the 9:00 a.m. CT start of the gas day.

The council said it “thoroughly considered” changes to the start of the gas day, looking at three earlier starts (12 midnight, 3 a.m., 6 a.m. CT) and one later (12 noon CT).

It said nighttime starts “raise significant safety concerns” and could make shipper imbalances more difficult to manage. It also noted that some existing contracts are based on the start of the gas day and that different start times would “have vastly different impacts by region.”

As a result, the Council said its consensus was that the gas day must remain unchanged.

FERC’s NOPR would begin the gas day at 4 a.m. CT, the beginning of the morning electric ramp in the East, and before the morning electric ramp in other regions of the country. The change would ensure that generators in all regions would enter the morning electric peak with new daily gas nominations.

“This should largely eliminate the concern that some gas-fired generators will be unable to run during a substantial part of the morning ramp period, because they have burned through their nominated gas before the start of the next gas day,” the commission said. “… As a consequence, gas-fired generators should be less likely either to incur imbalances on pipelines or inform electric transmission operators that they are unavailable.”

Timely Nomination Deadline

The Gas Council said moving the Timely Nomination deadline to 1 p.m. would give generators a greater opportunity to participate in the timely nomination cycle, during which most pipeline capacity is confirmed. It also would increase the value of firm transportation and reduce forecasting errors, the Council said.

This matches the change FERC proposes.

The tradeoff: a 20% to 30% increase in hours for schedulers and traders. In addition, pipelines and LDCs would have less time to confirm and schedule, and producers and customers would have less time to react.

Intraday Changes

The Council said providing two “bumpable” intraday cycles during business hours would help generators manage intraday variations in load and changes in dispatch orders. This, too, would increase staffing costs and create operational challenges on particularly active days.

The proposed third intraday cycle would have a 9 p.m. deadline, with gas flowing at midnight.

This would reduce the gap between the last scheduling opportunity and the end of the gas day to 12 hours, making it easier for generators to arrange for fuel supplies at the beginning of the electric day and avoid derates during the morning ramp.

The Council said that because of limited liquidity in the evening, this cycle may be primarily used to move gas into or out of storage. It, too, would require increased staffing.

To ensure that schedulers and traders can end their day knowing that their gas will flow, the late cycle would not allow bumping.

The Gas Council said it was eager to reach consensus with FERC and electric industry stakeholders, fearing that the alternative would be “contentious and time consuming with substantial uncertainty as to outcome.”

FERC proposed to move from two to four standard intraday nomination cycles, which would occur at 8 a.m., 10:30 a.m., 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., but is predicated upon a 4 a.m. start to the gas day.

180-Day Deadline

The NOPR provides 180 days for the natural gas and electric industries to reach consensus on standards through the North American Energy Standards Board.

FERC issued a separate order investigating RTO and ISO day-ahead scheduling practices. It also issued a rule to show cause, requiring interstate natural gas pipeline operators to revise their tariffs to allow posting offers to purchase released pipeline capacity.

At Thursday’s FERC meeting, Commissioner John R. Norris applauded efforts to improve coordination between the two industries.

“I recognize that finding solutions is particularly challenging for the natural gas industry which faces a greater share of the burden with respect to necessary changes,” Norris said in a statement. “I support today’s order because I believe a more formal process with a specific timeline for action is needed now to bring together all segments of the gas and electric industries to find solutions to gas-electric issues facing our industry.”

Norris said the orders will ensure the existing pipeline infrastructure is optimized “before investing additional funds in new infrastructure.”

But the Gas Council said additional pipeline capacity was also needed, saying the “central issue of how to expand gas infrastructure, particularly in the Northeast, will not be solved by scheduling issues.”

March 25, 2014April 11, 2024

State Briefs

Bill Would Put Wind Farm Authority in State Hands

State Sen. John Sullivan has introduced a bill to transfer responsibility for siting and regulating wind turbines from counties to states. Local governments would be able to conduct public hearings on proposed wind farms, but the state Department of Agriculture would handle all permitting and other processes.

Sullivan wants to eliminate inconsistency in requirements and in county resources to handle the facility proposals.

Counties object to the idea, as does the wind power industry. Wind on the Wires Public Policy Manager Erick Borgia noted that similar legislation has been introduced, unsuccessfully, in the past.

More: National Wind Watch

500 kW Solar Farm is First For a Cooperative in State

Illinois Rural Electric Cooperative christened its four-acre, 500 kW solar facility south of Winchester – the first utility-scale photovoltaic solar energy system for a co-op in the state. The $1.8 million installation was helped by a $416,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Rural Energy for America Program and a $500,000 grant from the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity’s Renewable Energy Business Development Program.

“We couldn’t have undertaken this project without federal and state assistance,” co-op President Robert Brown said.

More: The Telegraph

Constellation Wins Deal To Supply Suburban Group

Constellation, Exelon’s retail arm, has won a three-year power supply contract for a large suburban Chicago municipal consortium, a group of seven led by the villages of Buffalo Grove and Arlington Heights. The arrangement involves 95,000 households and small businesses.

The deal, to provide power at 6.5 cents/kWh, is expected to beat Commonwealth Edison’s default price, which is to rise in June from the current 6.02 cents to more than 7 cents. ComEd is an Exelon company as well.

Not every community in the consortium has the same rate or arrangements. Arlington Heights rates, for example, will be 6.62 cents/kWh, because its supply is green energy.

More: Line-Man.com; Chicago Tribune

Batavia Executes Rate Hike Attributable to Prairie State

Burdened like a number of other communities by the $5 billion cost of the Prairie State Energy Campus, the Batavia City Council voted to raise its sales tax by 0.5% and its residential electricity rates 6.5% in both 2014 and 2015, with a $4 increase in the monthly customer charge. Different increases will apply to commercial and industrial customers. The council agreed to add a provision that would sunset the sales tax increase in three years.

The troubled coal plant saw its construction costs double, from $2.5 billion to $5 billion, because of design changes and construction overruns.

More: Chicago Tribune

INDIANA

Court Upholds Decision On Edwardsport Rates

The state Court of Appeals affirmed utility regulators’ 2012 decision to raise electricity rates 16% to pay for Duke Energy’s $3.5 billion Edwardsport coal gasification plant. Citizen and environmental groups challenged the Utility Regulatory Commission’s decision, citing huge cost overruns, and questioned the quality of regulatory oversight.

The court acknowledged the plant suffered the cost overruns but said the URC took that into account. The Citizens Action Coalition said it might appeal the ruling.

More: Indianapolis Star

Pence Pressed For, Against Ending Efficiency Program

Honeywell and Ingersoll Rand, companies with energy-efficiency business interests, have joined environmental groups in urging Gov. Mike Pence to veto a bill that would kill the state’s Energizing Indiana program. Pence has until March 27 to decide whether to sign the bill, which would defund the program at the end of the year.

The Indiana Manufacturers Association initiated efforts for the bill, arguing the program costs business too much with little return. The Indiana Energy Association, a utility group, did not instigate the bill but says it supports it.

More: Seattle Post-Intelligencer; Midwest Energy News

Proposal for 5 MW Wind Farm Eyed in Monroe

Solar Zentrum has proposed a 5 MW solar farm on land owned by Monroe County in southern Indiana. County officials have agreed to move the idea forward. The property is near a power transfer station. Duke Energy Indiana recently published a solicitation for 5 MW of solar.

More: The Elkhart Truth; Duke Energy

KENTUCKY

Enviros to Sue LG&E Over Ash Pond Discharges

The Sierra Club and Earthjustice have filed an intent to sue Louisville Gas & Electric for what they say are Clean Water Act and permit violations at the Mill Creek power plant’s coal ash pond.

Evidence from a hidden camera across the Ohio River from the Louisville facility shows a constant gushing of ash wastewater, not an occasional discharge as the permit allows, according to the groups. A Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet spokesman said the discharge does comply with the permit.

More: LEO Weekly

House Panel OKs Big Sandy Bill Over Ky. Power Protest

A House committee approved legislation to force the Public Service Commission to reconsider its order allowing Kentucky Power to close the Big Sandy coal plant. Kentucky Power, a unit of American Electric Power, would replace its power by buying a half-interest in the Mitchell plant in West Virginia.

Majority Floor Leader Rocky Adkins supports the measure, as does House Speaker Greg Stumbo. For Adkins and other lawmakers, it is a matter of coal industry jobs, possibly even if keeping Big Sandy open would mean a 30% rate increase to pay for environmental controls. Kentucky Power President Greg Pauley opposed the bill.

More: Daily Independent

MARYLAND

PSC Flooded With Rate Complaints

The Public Service Commission saw a nine-fold increase in complaints about high electric bills in February as the impact of the frigid winter hit customer bills. “We’re averaging about 35 to 40 new complaints a day,” said Obi Linton, who directs the agency’s office of external relations.

Customers with variable-rate contracts got a double whammy. They used more power and discovered just how variable their rates are.

More: The Baltimore Sun

RGGI Elects New Chair And Executive Board

Kelly Speakes-Backman, a member of the Maryland Public Service Commission, is the new chairman of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, succeeding Kenneth Kimmell of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. She and newly elected board members will serve through the end of the year.

More: RGGI

MICHIGAN

DTE 818 MW Solar Plant Will Be Company’s Biggest

The 19th solar power project in southeast Michigan, and DTE’s largest solar project so far at 818 kW, is being assembled near I-96 in Lyons Township. The $3.5 million facility should be finished by May, DTE said. Michigan utilities are required to get 10% of supply from renewables by 2015.

More: Detroit Free Press

NEW JERSEY

BPU Rejects Fishermen’s Energy; Bill is Too High

The state Board of Public Utilities killed the only offshore wind project yet to be considered by the agency, a pilot to build a 25 MW wind farm about three miles off Atlantic City.

Last summer, the board rejected a proposed settlement between Fishermen’s Energy Atlantic City and the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel that would have allowed the project to go forward. The proposal resurfaced during hearings before the agency this winter.

The commissioners questioned the financial viability of the project and agreed with staff that it would be too costly to ratepayers. Clean energy advocates said the decision sends the wrong signal to other offshore developers. New Jersey has a goal of developing 1,100 MW of offshore wind capacity by 2020.

More: NJSpotlight

BPU Approves JCP&L Storm Recovery Cost Settlement

The Board of Public Utilities approved a settlement allowing Jersey Central Power & Light to recover about $736 million from customers to pay for the cost of responding to a series of extreme storms. When those costs — mostly attributable to Superstorm Sandy — will show up on ratepayer bills is still uncertain.

For the utility, the approval of the settlement may cushion the impact of a pending decision in a separate rate case before the agency. Both the BPU staff and the Division of Rate Counsel are seeking to cut the utility’s rates by more than $200 million, a step some say would trim customers’ bills by one-third.

More: NJSpotlight

NORTH CAROLINA

Grand Jury Begins as Duke Ash Pond Issues Proliferate

A federal grand jury was convened to probe the Feb. 2 spill from Duke Energy’s coal ash pond at the Dan River generating station. At least 23 subpoenas were issued in the investigation, which is looking into the state Department of Environment and Natural Resources’ oversight of the ash ponds.

The DENR reopened the much-criticized settlement it reached last year with Duke over ash ponds near Charlotte and Asheville. Environmentalists had been calling the settlement a sweetheart deal.

As Duke outlined its intentions for dealing with ash ponds throughout the state, the DENR said it would put new conditions into a permit for the company’s Asheville plant.

More: America Now; Carolina Public Press; Los Angeles Times

Review Plan for New Lee Plant, Group Urges NCUC

The citizens group NC WARN wants the North Carolina Utilities Commission to review Duke Energy’s plan for a 750 MW combined cycle plant at its existing Lee site near Anderson, S.C., although the commission lacks explicit jurisdiction to do so. The commission could review it as part of Duke’s integrated resource plan or it could open a separate docket, NC WARN said.

The plant will serve North Carolina customers, but there has been no showing it is needed or the minimum $750 million cost is justified, according to the group.

Duke acknowledged that the NCUC has discretionary authority to review the plan, but noted that the commission would review the costs, anyway, in a future rate case. The company said the plant was necessary to ensure supply as it retires old coal facilities.

More: Power Engineering

OHIO

Cincinnati Deal Allows Green, Fossil Choices

Cincinnati residents will be able to choose between green and fossil fuel power under a compromise between the city manager and council members. Since 2012, the city had purchased 100% of its electricity from non-fossil sources under an aggregation program. But this year the city negotiated a new two-year deal with First Energy Solutions that would obtain power from fossil fuel sources, saving residents $5.63 a year.

That brought pushback from several council members. In response, the city manager said that First Energy would let city residents choose whether they wanted green energy or fossil fuel power. Customers also will be able to opt out of the city’s aggregation purchase entirely.

More: Cincinnati Business Courier

Hearing Moves Davis-Besse Along on License Extension

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public hearing today at Camp Perry on FirstEnergy’s request for a 20-year operating license extension for the Davis-Besse nuclear plant. The hearing will focus on a draft environmental impact statement the NRC released in February.

The EIS is to be finalized by September. The plant’s current 40-year license is to expire April 22, 2017.

More: The Blade

PENNSYLVANIA

PUC Making It Easier For Customers to Switch

The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission plans to shorten the time it takes for customers to switch suppliers. The agency has drafted regulations that would require electric distribution companies to complete a customer’s switch in three business days instead of the 11 to 14 days it takes now. The change is in response to nearly 5,000 complaints and 12,000 expressions of concern from customers about this winter’s extreme price increases.

Utilities would be required to implement the changes within six months of the new regulations becoming final. Cost recovery for implementation would be addressed in each utility’s next base rate proceeding.

The PUC also has solicited comments on proposed regulations that will provide customers more detailed electric supplier disclosure statements and more timely information on “contract renewal” and “change in terms” notices.

More: Public Utility Commission; The Morning Call

VIRGINIA

Duke Ash Spill Resonates; Locals Express Confidence

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe said Duke Energy assured him it would repair any damage to the state from the coal ash pond spill into the Dan River in North Carolina, upriver of Danville, Va. Most activity surrounding the spill has to do with North Carolina, but Danville, whose water supply comes from the river, is across the border.

McAuliffe visited Danville, expressing confidence that its water was safe. Local leaders also declared their water safe, commended Duke for its handling of spill repercussions and said they were tallying their costs for dealing with the ash-contaminated river water for submission to the company.

More: The New York Times; Richmond Times-Dispatch

SCC Approves Rate Adjustment for APCo

The State Corporation Commission approved a request by Appalachian Power Co. to recover $48.6 million in increased costs associated with transmission services provided to the utility, slightly less than the $49.9 million APCo had sought in December.

The Transmission Rate Adjustment Clause will become effective in May, raising the average residential customer bill by about $3.88, or 3.5%.

More: State Corporation Commission

Offshore Wind Project Moves to Public Hearing

The federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has scheduled an April 3 public hearing as it prepares an environmental assessment for the Virginia Offshore Wind Technology Advancement Project. The project, an effort of the state and Dominion Virginia Power, proposes two 6 MW wind turbines 27 miles offshore from Virginia Beach on platforms designed to withstand hurricane-force winds.

If approved, it would be operational by 2017. The project got $4 million from the U.S. Department of Energy.

More: PilotOnline.com

March 25, 2014

Company Briefs

Exelon has agreed to buy ETC ProLiance Energy, which supplies natural gas to commercial and industrial customers, generators and utilities. The Indianapolis-based ProLiance, which serves customers in eight Midwest states, will become part of Exelon competitive retail unit Constellation. ProLiance is a unit of ETC Marketing of Dallas. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter.

More: Exelon

Exelon Nuclear Teams Up With AMEC for Projects

London-based engineering and project management company AMEC has teamed up with Exelon Nuclear Partners to explore opportunities in new markets. According to AMEC, the partnership will focus on new and existing reactor marketplaces, providing engineering, consulting, project management and operations support service. “It supports our strategy to grow our nuclear capability and will create a formidable entity to target major projects in new and exciting markets such as the Middle East and mainland Europe,” said Clive White, president of AMEC’s Clean Energy Europe business, citing his company’s synergy with Exelon’s “unrivalled operational experience.” AMEC said the companies also would explore opportunities in renewables, transmission and distribution, and that they have already identified some possible projects.

More: AMEC

Mercuria in $3.5B Deal To Buy JPMorgan Unit

JPMorgan Chase, which for months was looking for a buyer for its physical commodities trading unit, has agreed to sell it to Swiss trading firm Mercuria Energy Group for $3.5 billion. It is unclear whether Blythe Masters, head of Global Commodities at the bank, will be going to Mercuria. Masters came under scrutiny last year when the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission charged the bank with manipulating California’s energy markets. In a document that became public, FERC said Masters had made false and misleading statements under oath. FERC, however, did not pursue action against her and ultimately approved a settlement with the company, with JPMorgan paying $410 million in fines and disgorged profits. (See Analysis – JP Morgan Settlement: A Verdict on Electric Markets?)

More: The New York Times; BloombergBusinessweek

March 25, 2014

ODEC, NCEMC Win Dominion Undergrounding Dispute

FERC upheld an earlier ruling that Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (ODEC) and North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation (NCEMC) shouldn’t have to help pay for $173.4 million in undergrounding for three projects in Virginia that Dominion Resources’ Virginia Electric and Power Co. included in its 2010 Annual Transmission Revenue Requirement.

Incremental ATRR costs are borne by all wholesale transmission users of the grid. ODEC and NCEMC argued in their original complaint that it was not just and reasonable for wholesale transmission customers outside Virginia to bear the cost of undergrounding when it is done for aesthetic concerns and has no impact on reliability.

The three projects were: a 230 kV line to the new Hamilton Substation in Northern Virginia, with two miles of undergrounding ($32.9 million); the DuPont Fabros project, a 0.71 mile double-circuit 230 kV underground transmission line and substation in Loudon County ($9.8 million); and the Garrisonville project, a five-mile, double-circuit 230 kV transmission line in Stafford County, Va. ($131 million).

ODEC and NCEMC said that the projects’ costs were either recoverable from Virginia ratepayers, or hadn’t been proven to be necessary for system reliability, and therefore should not have been included in Dominion’s ATRR.

ODEC serves more than 550,000 customers in Virginia, Maryland and Delaware. NCEMC serves 950,000 households and businesses in North Carolina.

“We find that wholesale transmission customers outside of the Commonwealth of Virginia should not be responsible for costs that are a direct result of legislation and VSCC pilot projects intended to benefit citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia,” the commission wrote in an order last week (EL10-49).

The commission said a trial would be set to determine the amount of refunds due to ODEC and NCEMC, but it urged the parties to seek a settlement.